DIS Shareholders and Stock Info ONLY

Herewith, the Final Word from "The Newspaper of Record" (guffaw, guffaw). In all seriousness, I would pay a bit of attention to what James Stewart writes, as he is quite familiar with how DIS' world works. Remember, though, he's about to write another book.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/21/business/media/disney-bob-iger.html

Iger’s Sudden Return to Disney Shocks a Discontented Kingdom
After Bob Chapek, the departing chief executive, tried to put a sunny spin on a disastrous earnings report this month, senior Disney leaders began talking about resigning.
Nov. 21, 2022, 6:42 p.m. ET

After a transition to power marked by numerous setbacks, some self-inflicted, Bob Chapek seemed by early fall to have finally found his footing after two years as Disney’s chief executive.

The company’s board had unanimously renewed his contract, extending his reign until at least July 2025. In August, Disney reported stellar quarterly earnings, including a 50 percent jump in profit, passing Netflix for the first time in streaming subscriptions. At a Disney fan convention in September, Mr. Chapek pitched a rosy future for the company that included coming blockbusters like “Avatar: The Way of Water” and new theme park rides. “I’m very, very bullish,” Jim Cramer, the CNBC host, said on air about the company in October.

Then, in November, came Disney’s now-infamous quarterly earnings report.

Eye-popping losses in streaming. Lower-than-expected theme park profitability. Sharp challenges in cable television, including at ESPN. And yet Mr. Chapek inexplicably purred through an earnings conference call with analysts and investors, spinning the results as positive and offering gooey observations about Disney’s ability to sell “magical memories that last a lifetime.”

The report and call set into motion events that culminated on Sunday with the firing of Mr. Chapek by the Disney board and the surprise reinstatement of his predecessor, Robert A. Iger, as chief executive until December 2024.

It wasn’t just that some senior Disney leaders were aghast about the quarterly results and Mr. Chapek’s seemingly delusional delivery of them: Several began speaking openly about resigning if he remained in power, talk that swiftly reached the Disney board. Christine M. McCarthy, Disney’s well-regarded chief financial officer, directly told at least one board member that she lacked confidence in Mr. Chapek. “He irretrievably lost the room,” the leader of a Disney unit said on Monday.

This article was based on interviews with more than a dozen people, including Disney executives, bankers who work with Disney, investors in the company, and people close to Mr. Iger and Mr. Chapek, who all spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the shocking and sensitive nature of the leadership change. A Disney spokeswoman declined to comment, except to say Mr. Iger was unavailable for an interview. Mr. Chapek did not respond to requests for comment.

With investors fleeing Disney — its stock dropped 13 percent the day after the earnings report, the biggest decline since the Sept. 11 attacks — and Mr. Cramer of CNBC now openly calling for Mr. Chapek to be fired, the Disney board decided to push the panic button.

Susan Arnold, the board chair, called Mr. Iger, 71, at 3 p.m. on Friday and asked him to return.

At public events over the past year — and in conversations with confidants as recently as this month — Mr. Iger repeatedly insisted that he had no intention of returning to Disney. At the same time, Mr. Iger had for months been privately railing against Mr. Chapek, according to several people who spoke with him.

He lamented Mr. Chapek’s seeming lack of empathy and emotional intelligence, which resulted in an inability to communicate with or relate to Hollywood’s creative community. Disney seemed to be losing its soul, he confided to one associate.

Perturbed about Mr. Iger’s trash talk, which made its way back to Disney headquarters, the headstrong Mr. Chapek responded by icing Mr. Iger out — rather than turning to the more experienced executive for advice. Mr. Iger, for instance, never got a call for help when Disney was criticized internally and externally this spring over its approach to legislation in Florida meant to prohibit classroom discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity through the third grade.

This seemed to further annoy Mr. Iger, according to two people who spoke with him.

In Mr. Iger’s later years as Disney’s chief executive, he became, as longtime leaders tend to, more cognizant about his legacy. His tenure at Disney was almost unblemished. He led Disney to record financial results and engineered Disney’s acquisitions of Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm and the majority of 21st Century Fox, substantially altering the entertainment landscape. He successfully introduced the streaming service Disney+.

But the more Mr. Chapek floundered, the more Mr. Iger’s reputation also suffered. Mr. Iger handpicked Mr. Chapek for the job, believing that Mr. Chapek’s blunt, unsentimental business style would help Disney continue its transformation into a streaming superpower. According to three people briefed on the matter, Mr. Chapek was privately told that he was heir apparent as early as 2018, much earlier than initially realized, and so Mr. Iger had ample time to train him. The final piece of Mr. Iger’s legacy — a successful and smooth handoff of power — had been denied. It was embarrassing.

At the same time, Disney’s board was contending with a new threat from an activist investor. Earlier this year, Mr. Chapek and the board successfully managed to navigate a series of demands from Daniel Loeb and his Third Point hedge fund. This month, however, Trian Fund Management purchased more than $800 million of Disney stock and started pushing for its own shake-up and cost cuts.

Wall Street cheered Mr. Iger’s return. Disney gained $12 billion in value overnight, as shares jumped 10 percent on Monday morning. Disney executives, while shocked by the turn of events, were mostly thrilled to see him. (“Daddy’s back!” one male senior executive at the company texted on Sunday.) Other Disney employees wondered whether a Sunday night email from Mr. Iger announcing his return was a prank, one employee said, and texted their co-workers just to be sure it wasn’t a hoax. The Hollywood Reporter, a trade news publication, ran the headline “Bob Iger Returns as Hero in Waiting to Save a Battered Disney.”

But there was also a contingent that wondered if Mr. Iger had helped engineer a coup. Doug Creutz, an analyst at Cowen, told his clients on Monday that the development “gives at least some appearance that Iger, and not the board, ultimately calls the shots at the company, and that Iger’s willingness to fully surrender power to a successor is low.”

He added, “We do not necessarily believe that a lack of leadership is Disney’s problem, and think the change will ultimately make a true transition of power to Iger’s (next) successor even more difficult.”

There are senior executives at Disney who could be groomed into chief executive material, including Dana Walden, Disney’s television chief, and Josh D’Amaro, Disney’s theme park chairman. But neither is quite ready, a person close to the board said.

Two previous candidates to succeed Mr. Iger, Thomas O. Staggs and Kevin Mayer, left Disney and are now running a media start-up. A person close to Disney’s board had reached out to them this year when Mr. Chapek’s contract renewal was under consideration. According to two people familiar with the matter, this person posed a hypothetical question: Would one or both be interested in returning to run Disney? Any deal to bring them back into the Disney fold would have required the company to acquire their start-up, Candle Media, a multibillion-dollar firm that owns Hello Sunshine, the media company founded by Reese Witherspoon, according to the people.

Mr. Staggs and Mr. Mayer demurred, the people said.

That left the board with only one serious option: Mr. Iger.

But he is not a long-term solution. At least a few board members believe they made an error with succession planning the last time — namely deciding that promoting from within was the only real choice. In announcing Mr. Iger’s return, the company said in a statement that he did so with a mandate to develop “a successor to lead the company at the completion of his term.”

Mr. Iger, who reached his deal with Disney on Sunday, has a compensation package that includes a base salary of $1 million, stock incentives expected to be worth $25 million annually and an annual bonus expected to be worth $1 million.

None of the big media companies have yet been able to figure out how to navigate past the collapse of cable television. Streaming services were once viewed as the solution, and still may be, but there has been a drastic shift over the last six months. The game is no longer about growing the number of global subscriptions at any cost; investors now want to see old-fashioned profit.

But Disney has one problem that its competitors do not, and it involves Mr. Chapek’s biggest move during his time as chief executive.

In 2020, Mr. Chapek restructured Disney to give priority to the company’s streaming services (Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+). He took away profit-and-loss responsibility from the executives who run Disney’s movie and television studios, and gave it to a protégé, Kareem Daniel, who was named chairman of a new division, Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution.

The loss of that turf — along with control over when and how films and shows would be released — upset longtime Disney executives, including Alan Bergman, the chairman of Disney Studios Content. Making the situation more touchy, Mr. Daniel had little experience in the vast area he was given to oversee. Mr. Chapek repeatedly insisted that his deeply unpopular reorganization was, in fact, the opposite, with “100 percent buy-in” from Disney managers.

Mr. Daniel’s division is notably the one that contributed the $1.5 billion in “peak” streaming losses for the recent quarter, up from $630 million a year earlier, surprising investors.

Mr. Iger ousted Mr. Daniel on Monday. In a note to employees, Mr. Iger said a new company structure was on the way that “puts more decision-making back in the hands of our creative teams and rationalizes costs.”

Mr. Iger faces other challenges.

A competitive frenzy has erupted around sports broadcasting rights, with Apple, Amazon and others driving up prices, which has hurt ESPN’s bottom line. Sports betting is viewed by some investors as the new streaming — a fast-growth master fix — but fully embracing that business could taint the family-friendly Disney brand.

Animated movies, the heartbeat of Disney, have started to struggle, with Pixar’s “Lightyear” bombing in June and “Strange World” expected to disappoint at the Thanksgiving box office.

A deteriorating U.S. economy could hurt attendance and spending at theme parks, where fans have already been upset over near-constant price increases.

Mr. Iger may well be able to quickly put Disney back on the right track, solving his legacy problem in the process. Or he may come to wish he had heeded his own words, spoken during a podcast interview this year when asked if he would consider returning to Disney.

“I was C.E.O. for a long time,” he said. “You can’t go home again. I’m gone.”

Lauren Hirsch contributed reporting.
 
I am happy to see some positivity on these boards and through the DIS community. I have actually seen Bob Iger walking through the parks both at DL and WDW. He at least has charisma and the ability to come across like a human being.

Whether the USA parks get any extra love remains to be seen but at least there are positive vibes and not doom and gloom.
 
Herewith, the Final Word from "The Newspaper of Record" (guffaw, guffaw). In all seriousness, I would pay a bit of attention to what James Stewart writes, as he is quite familiar with how DIS' world works. Remember, though, he's about to write another book.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/21/business/media/disney-bob-iger.html

Iger’s Sudden Return to Disney Shocks a Discontented Kingdom
After Bob Chapek, the departing chief executive, tried to put a sunny spin on a disastrous earnings report this month, senior Disney leaders began talking about resigning.
Nov. 21, 2022, 6:42 p.m. ET

After a transition to power marked by numerous setbacks, some self-inflicted, Bob Chapek seemed by early fall to have finally found his footing after two years as Disney’s chief executive.

The company’s board had unanimously renewed his contract, extending his reign until at least July 2025. In August, Disney reported stellar quarterly earnings, including a 50 percent jump in profit, passing Netflix for the first time in streaming subscriptions. At a Disney fan convention in September, Mr. Chapek pitched a rosy future for the company that included coming blockbusters like “Avatar: The Way of Water” and new theme park rides. “I’m very, very bullish,” Jim Cramer, the CNBC host, said on air about the company in October.

Then, in November, came Disney’s now-infamous quarterly earnings report.

Eye-popping losses in streaming. Lower-than-expected theme park profitability. Sharp challenges in cable television, including at ESPN. And yet Mr. Chapek inexplicably purred through an earnings conference call with analysts and investors, spinning the results as positive and offering gooey observations about Disney’s ability to sell “magical memories that last a lifetime.”

The report and call set into motion events that culminated on Sunday with the firing of Mr. Chapek by the Disney board and the surprise reinstatement of his predecessor, Robert A. Iger, as chief executive until December 2024.

It wasn’t just that some senior Disney leaders were aghast about the quarterly results and Mr. Chapek’s seemingly delusional delivery of them: Several began speaking openly about resigning if he remained in power, talk that swiftly reached the Disney board. Christine M. McCarthy, Disney’s well-regarded chief financial officer, directly told at least one board member that she lacked confidence in Mr. Chapek. “He irretrievably lost the room,” the leader of a Disney unit said on Monday.

This article was based on interviews with more than a dozen people, including Disney executives, bankers who work with Disney, investors in the company, and people close to Mr. Iger and Mr. Chapek, who all spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the shocking and sensitive nature of the leadership change. A Disney spokeswoman declined to comment, except to say Mr. Iger was unavailable for an interview. Mr. Chapek did not respond to requests for comment.

With investors fleeing Disney — its stock dropped 13 percent the day after the earnings report, the biggest decline since the Sept. 11 attacks — and Mr. Cramer of CNBC now openly calling for Mr. Chapek to be fired, the Disney board decided to push the panic button.

Susan Arnold, the board chair, called Mr. Iger, 71, at 3 p.m. on Friday and asked him to return.

At public events over the past year — and in conversations with confidants as recently as this month — Mr. Iger repeatedly insisted that he had no intention of returning to Disney. At the same time, Mr. Iger had for months been privately railing against Mr. Chapek, according to several people who spoke with him.

He lamented Mr. Chapek’s seeming lack of empathy and emotional intelligence, which resulted in an inability to communicate with or relate to Hollywood’s creative community. Disney seemed to be losing its soul, he confided to one associate.

Perturbed about Mr. Iger’s trash talk, which made its way back to Disney headquarters, the headstrong Mr. Chapek responded by icing Mr. Iger out — rather than turning to the more experienced executive for advice. Mr. Iger, for instance, never got a call for help when Disney was criticized internally and externally this spring over its approach to legislation in Florida meant to prohibit classroom discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity through the third grade.

This seemed to further annoy Mr. Iger, according to two people who spoke with him.

In Mr. Iger’s later years as Disney’s chief executive, he became, as longtime leaders tend to, more cognizant about his legacy. His tenure at Disney was almost unblemished. He led Disney to record financial results and engineered Disney’s acquisitions of Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm and the majority of 21st Century Fox, substantially altering the entertainment landscape. He successfully introduced the streaming service Disney+.

But the more Mr. Chapek floundered, the more Mr. Iger’s reputation also suffered. Mr. Iger handpicked Mr. Chapek for the job, believing that Mr. Chapek’s blunt, unsentimental business style would help Disney continue its transformation into a streaming superpower. According to three people briefed on the matter, Mr. Chapek was privately told that he was heir apparent as early as 2018, much earlier than initially realized, and so Mr. Iger had ample time to train him. The final piece of Mr. Iger’s legacy — a successful and smooth handoff of power — had been denied. It was embarrassing.

At the same time, Disney’s board was contending with a new threat from an activist investor. Earlier this year, Mr. Chapek and the board successfully managed to navigate a series of demands from Daniel Loeb and his Third Point hedge fund. This month, however, Trian Fund Management purchased more than $800 million of Disney stock and started pushing for its own shake-up and cost cuts.

Wall Street cheered Mr. Iger’s return. Disney gained $12 billion in value overnight, as shares jumped 10 percent on Monday morning. Disney executives, while shocked by the turn of events, were mostly thrilled to see him. (“Daddy’s back!” one male senior executive at the company texted on Sunday.) Other Disney employees wondered whether a Sunday night email from Mr. Iger announcing his return was a prank, one employee said, and texted their co-workers just to be sure it wasn’t a hoax. The Hollywood Reporter, a trade news publication, ran the headline “Bob Iger Returns as Hero in Waiting to Save a Battered Disney.”

But there was also a contingent that wondered if Mr. Iger had helped engineer a coup. Doug Creutz, an analyst at Cowen, told his clients on Monday that the development “gives at least some appearance that Iger, and not the board, ultimately calls the shots at the company, and that Iger’s willingness to fully surrender power to a successor is low.”

He added, “We do not necessarily believe that a lack of leadership is Disney’s problem, and think the change will ultimately make a true transition of power to Iger’s (next) successor even more difficult.”

There are senior executives at Disney who could be groomed into chief executive material, including Dana Walden, Disney’s television chief, and Josh D’Amaro, Disney’s theme park chairman. But neither is quite ready, a person close to the board said.

Two previous candidates to succeed Mr. Iger, Thomas O. Staggs and Kevin Mayer, left Disney and are now running a media start-up. A person close to Disney’s board had reached out to them this year when Mr. Chapek’s contract renewal was under consideration. According to two people familiar with the matter, this person posed a hypothetical question: Would one or both be interested in returning to run Disney? Any deal to bring them back into the Disney fold would have required the company to acquire their start-up, Candle Media, a multibillion-dollar firm that owns Hello Sunshine, the media company founded by Reese Witherspoon, according to the people.

Mr. Staggs and Mr. Mayer demurred, the people said.

That left the board with only one serious option: Mr. Iger.

But he is not a long-term solution. At least a few board members believe they made an error with succession planning the last time — namely deciding that promoting from within was the only real choice. In announcing Mr. Iger’s return, the company said in a statement that he did so with a mandate to develop “a successor to lead the company at the completion of his term.”

Mr. Iger, who reached his deal with Disney on Sunday, has a compensation package that includes a base salary of $1 million, stock incentives expected to be worth $25 million annually and an annual bonus expected to be worth $1 million.

None of the big media companies have yet been able to figure out how to navigate past the collapse of cable television. Streaming services were once viewed as the solution, and still may be, but there has been a drastic shift over the last six months. The game is no longer about growing the number of global subscriptions at any cost; investors now want to see old-fashioned profit.

But Disney has one problem that its competitors do not, and it involves Mr. Chapek’s biggest move during his time as chief executive.

In 2020, Mr. Chapek restructured Disney to give priority to the company’s streaming services (Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+). He took away profit-and-loss responsibility from the executives who run Disney’s movie and television studios, and gave it to a protégé, Kareem Daniel, who was named chairman of a new division, Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution.

The loss of that turf — along with control over when and how films and shows would be released — upset longtime Disney executives, including Alan Bergman, the chairman of Disney Studios Content. Making the situation more touchy, Mr. Daniel had little experience in the vast area he was given to oversee. Mr. Chapek repeatedly insisted that his deeply unpopular reorganization was, in fact, the opposite, with “100 percent buy-in” from Disney managers.

Mr. Daniel’s division is notably the one that contributed the $1.5 billion in “peak” streaming losses for the recent quarter, up from $630 million a year earlier, surprising investors.

Mr. Iger ousted Mr. Daniel on Monday. In a note to employees, Mr. Iger said a new company structure was on the way that “puts more decision-making back in the hands of our creative teams and rationalizes costs.”

Mr. Iger faces other challenges.

A competitive frenzy has erupted around sports broadcasting rights, with Apple, Amazon and others driving up prices, which has hurt ESPN’s bottom line. Sports betting is viewed by some investors as the new streaming — a fast-growth master fix — but fully embracing that business could taint the family-friendly Disney brand.

Animated movies, the heartbeat of Disney, have started to struggle, with Pixar’s “Lightyear” bombing in June and “Strange World” expected to disappoint at the Thanksgiving box office.

A deteriorating U.S. economy could hurt attendance and spending at theme parks, where fans have already been upset over near-constant price increases.

Mr. Iger may well be able to quickly put Disney back on the right track, solving his legacy problem in the process. Or he may come to wish he had heeded his own words, spoken during a podcast interview this year when asked if he would consider returning to Disney.

“I was C.E.O. for a long time,” he said. “You can’t go home again. I’m gone.”

Lauren Hirsch contributed reporting.
Thanks for posting! It was behind the paywall for me.
Some good info in this, as expected from James S.
It all seems to come back to how bad this company is at succession planning. They had years to get it right and still blew it. What will they do differntly this time?
 
Thanks for posting! It was behind the paywall for me.
Some good info in this, as expected from James S.
It all seems to come back to how bad this company is at succession planning. They had years to get it right and still blew it. What will they do differntly this time?
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/b...de-disney-decision-to-rehire-iger-1235267844/

Inside the Disney Board’s Decision to Swap Bobs

While some directors were looking to fire Chapek as early as June, Chairman Susan Arnold was reluctant to pull the trigger. Now even those cheering the move call Chapek's dismissal brutal: “No statement from him, no comment from him, no grace. It’s f***ing insane.”

November 21, 2022 5:54pm PST

The day after Disney shocked Hollywood by unceremoniously dispatching Bob Chapek as CEO, sources with ties to the company say discontent among some board members had been building to the point that there was discussion about replacing Chapek as far back as the directors’ late June meeting in Florida.

At that time, sources say, some on the board wanted to replace Chapek and appoint one of their own, Nike chairman Mark Parker, as interim CEO while conducting a search for a new permanent leader. But a source says Parker declined the role even as the idea arose more than once. Aside from Parker, these sources say, General Motors executive Mary Barra also advocated replacing Chapek at the June meeting. (Neither Parker nor Barra responded to requests for comment.)


By that point, Chapek had already piled up a set of widely derided moves. Aside from the much hashed-over public conflict over Scarlett Johansson’s compensation, Chapek’s flip-flop on Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ law at first roiled the Disney staff and then drew the wrath of Gov. Ron DeSantis. Another controversy erupted after Chapek’s abrupt and particularly brutal firing of Peter Rice, the well-regarded chairman of entertainment and programming. “Chapek has chosen another negative news cycle when he was just getting his feet back on the ground,” a longtime communications exec said at the time.

But sources say Board Chairman Susan Arnold was an advocate for Chapek. “Susan sided with Chapek from the beginning, even before [Iger] left,” says one. “She tried to put Iger back into his box. At every turn, she said, ‘Let Chapek run the company.’”

In the aftermath of Rice’s firing, Arnold released a supposedly unanimous statement of board “confidence and support” for Chapek. But many in the industry had noted that the board had yet to renew Chapek’s contract, which was set to expire in February 2023. Once again, top industry executives rolled their eyes. “You let the CEO get within a year of his contract being up,” one industry power player said at the time. “That by itself is a statement of non-support. A vote of confidence is nonsense.”

When the board discussed Chapek’s contract at the end of that month, according to one account, some wanted to extend it for only two years. But Arnold argued that would undercut Chapek too severely. A seeming compromise was reached: Chapek’s contract was extended for three years but backdated, leaving a bit more than two years on his deal.

Meanwhile, discontent with Chapek built, hitting a tipping point with the most recent earnings call and a subsequent note to staff regarding a hiring freeze, layoffs and other cost cutting that set off profound anxiety within the company. Two high level sources — who felt they should have been given a heads-up — say they were totally blindsided by the memo and left scrambling to figure out what they could still spend money on and what was now off limits.

Throughout it all, Iger’s disapproval of Chapek was a secret to no one. He is said to have warned at a board meeting in December 2021 in New York, just before he left the company, that the culture of Disney could be transformed negatively and rapidly. It was the last time he spoke to Chapek.

In recent months, Iger has spent his time dealing with his investments, sailing his yacht, working on a book and even talking with producer Brian Grazer about a movie based on the book Lucky 666: The Impossible Mission that Changed the War in the Pacific. Until his phone rang. It was Susan Arnold. Iger had not spoken to her since his final lunch with the board in New York last December.

When the end came for Chapek, even a Disney-connected source who is not a Chapek fan expressed shock at the way it went down. “He didn’t get to say goodbye or say, ‘I’ve decided to step down,’” this person says. Reminded of reports that Rice had likewise been unceremoniously dismissed following his own brief meeting with Chapek, this person adds, “I bet you it broke Chapek’s record of firing Rice in seven minutes. They called [Chapek] and said, ‘You’re out. Our lawyers will call your lawyers.’ No statement from him, no comment from him, no grace. It’s ****ing insane.”

As for current and even former Disney insiders, the change did feel insane, though welcome. “As much as it’s a wow,” says one, “in a weird way it felt inevitable.” Another noted that Iger has already undertaken a reorganization to undo the one imposed by Chapek, who had shifted power over financial decisions away from creative executives. “I’m happy he’s going to revert everything back to the way it was,” this person says. “As though Chapek was never there.” Iger and Chapek declined to comment.

Another Disney veteran observes the stunning irony: “Bob Iger messed up succession at Disney for 15 years. When he finally did it, it was a colossal mess-up. It’s extraordinary that [Iger] is the guy they chose to come back. It speaks to his reputation and the board’s lack of options and ineptitude. How could they have gotten to this place? How could this happen?”

Additional reporting by Alex Weprin.
 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2022/11/21/disney-parks-iger-chapek-ceo/

9 changes Disney fans want returning CEO Bob Iger to make at parks
Disney die-hards cheered Iger’s return. Now they’re demanding changes.
By Hannah Sampson
November 21, 2022 at 4:13 p.m. EST

Bob Iger is back in a CEO role for Disney. (Washington Post illustration; Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP; iStock)
Skip to main content
  1. Stop requiring reservations for parks
  2. Allow park-hopping earlier
  3. Abolish Genie Plus
  4. Make annual passes available again
  5. Reinstate the free airport shuttle
  6. Bring back dining plans
  7. Stop charging for MagicBands
  8. Lower prices
  9. For conservative fans, abandon ‘woke’ changes
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/22/business/bob-iger-disney-espn-hulu.html

What Will Iger Do with ESPN and Hulu?
With Robert Iger back in charge at Disney, his to-do list takes shape: turn around the streaming businesses, and groom a successor.
By Andrew Ross Sorkin, Ravi Mattu, Bernhard Warner, Sarah Kessler, Stephen Gandel, Michael J. de la Merced, Lauren Hirsch and Ephrat Livni
Nov. 22, 2022Updated 8:50 a.m. ET

What will Bob do next?

On Robert Iger’s first day back as C.E.O. of Disney, the stock popped, adding billions to the entertainment giant’s shrinking market valuation. Now comes the hard part: finding a path to growth, and resolving a Space Mountain-sized heap of concerns from the future of flashy properties like Hulu and ESPN to finding a successor.

Mr. Iger doesn’t have a lot of time to get things done. Weighed down by losses at the streaming service Disney+, the stock had been on its worst run in decades. Top executives — including Christine McCarthy, the company’s C.F.O. — had lost confidence in Bob Chapek, leading to his weekend ouster as C.E.O. just months after the board had extended his contract. Mr. Chapek had been Mr. Iger’s handpicked successor and the 71-year-old now has a two-year contract to find another lieutenant who can take the reins in 2025.

Who does he bring in? Mr. Iger is already reshaping Disney back in his image, announcing a big restructuring yesterday to give studio executives more control. A top Chapek content executive, Kareem Daniel, is out. Some are speculating Mr. Iger might try to bring back Peter Rice, the former TV content chief at Disney who clashed with Mr. Chapek and was fired in June. Mr. Rice had been seen as a possible successor to Mr. Chapek. Another well-regarded Disney executive is Dana Walden, who oversees content production and news programming. A plus: her strong ties to Iger.

Will Mr. Iger spin off ESPN? Finding new ways to profit from the popularity of Disney’s sports broadcaster has long been discussed. The activist investor Dan Loeb pushed Mr. Chapek to spin off ESPN this summer, but then relented. Equity analysts at Bank of America say everything is under review, including ESPN, now that Mr. Iger is back. “Iger has made public comments recently on the secular challenges in the linear TV ecosystem, which coupled with accelerating linear subscriber declines, could signal a potential openness to re-evaluate strategic alternatives,” the bank said in an investor note yesterday.

How does he turn the streaming businesses around? Let’s start with Disney+: Does he raise prices? (Bank of America sees this as a possibility). Does he put Hulu, in which Disney holds a majority stake, on the market to pay debt elsewhere? Could he even get a good price for it given how depressed valuations look? And what about its chief competitor, Netflix? Merger speculation about Disney and Netflix was rife five years ago. Or how about a deal with Apple? Mr. Iger made a number of big acquisitions in his first go-round as C.E.O., mostly around big franchises like Pixar and Marvel. Watch this space.

Why did he come back? That’s the big question everyone in media circles is asking. Mr. Iger left Disney (as chairman) last December beloved, and on top. There was talk of a presidential bid, or maybe an ambassador role. Now, he’s returning to a Disney that’s been bruised by the Covid pandemic and the streaming wars. Not to mention skyrocketing inflation and a battered global economy. Maybe, like his late friend Steve Jobs, the Apple co-founder who found success in a second act, Mr. Iger (who was previously on the board of the iPhone maker) sees this new adventure as one worth taking.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2022/11/21/disney-parks-iger-chapek-ceo/

9 changes Disney fans want returning CEO Bob Iger to make at parks
Disney die-hards cheered Iger’s return. Now they’re demanding changes.
By Hannah Sampson
November 21, 2022 at 4:13 p.m. EST

Bob Iger is back in a CEO role for Disney. (Washington Post illustration; Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP; iStock)
Skip to main content
  1. Stop requiring reservations for parks
  2. Allow park-hopping earlier
  3. Abolish Genie Plus
  4. Make annual passes available again
  5. Reinstate the free airport shuttle
  6. Bring back dining plans
  7. Stop charging for MagicBands
  8. Lower prices
  9. For conservative fans, abandon ‘woke’ changes
Hadn’t mentioned it but reinstating the free basic MBs would also be a nice gesture, particularly given how expensive the hotels have gotten. I’m not optimistic about most of the other issues on the list.
 
/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2022/11/21/disney-parks-iger-chapek-ceo/

9 changes Disney fans want returning CEO Bob Iger to make at parks
Disney die-hards cheered Iger’s return. Now they’re demanding changes.
By Hannah Sampson
November 21, 2022 at 4:13 p.m. EST

Bob Iger is back in a CEO role for Disney. (Washington Post illustration; Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP; iStock)
Skip to main content
  1. Stop requiring reservations for parks
  2. Allow park-hopping earlier
  3. Abolish Genie Plus
  4. Make annual passes available again
  5. Reinstate the free airport shuttle
  6. Bring back dining plans
  7. Stop charging for MagicBands
  8. Lower prices
  9. For conservative fans, abandon ‘woke’ changes
It
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2022/11/21/disney-parks-iger-chapek-ceo/

9 changes Disney fans want returning CEO Bob Iger to make at parks
Disney die-hards cheered Iger’s return. Now they’re demanding changes.
By Hannah Sampson
November 21, 2022 at 4:13 p.m. EST

Bob Iger is back in a CEO role for Disney. (Washington Post illustration; Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP; iStock)
Skip to main content
  1. Stop requiring reservations for parks
  2. Allow park-hopping earlier
  3. Abolish Genie Plus
  4. Make annual passes available again
  5. Reinstate the free airport shuttle
  6. Bring back dining plans
  7. Stop charging for MagicBands
  8. Lower prices
  9. For conservative fans, abandon ‘woke’ changes
it
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2022/11/21/disney-parks-iger-chapek-ceo/

9 changes Disney fans want returning CEO Bob Iger to make at parks
Disney die-hards cheered Iger’s return. Now they’re demanding changes.
By Hannah Sampson
November 21, 2022 at 4:13 p.m. EST

Bob Iger is back in a CEO role for Disney. (Washington Post illustration; Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP; iStock)
Skip to main content
  1. Stop requiring reservations for parks
  2. Allow park-hopping earlier
  3. Abolish Genie Plus
  4. Make annual passes available again
  5. Reinstate the free airport shuttle
  6. Bring back dining plans
  7. Stop charging for MagicBands
  8. Lower prices
  9. For conservative fans, abandon ‘woke’ changes

Never used the dining plan, but everything else is 100% spot on. Doubt any of it happens, but who knows?
 
https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney...uccessor-as-ceo-creating-tensions-11669165304

Fascinating article… LIkely written with high level leaks from Iger apologists/fans….

The article reads like a valentine to the Disney fan and cast member community….

Key takeaways:

- Chapek wanted to fire everybody in February 2020… Iger said, hold onto them until CARES act gives them worker protections.
- Iger thought Chapek was moving too quickly and making the parks too expensive.
- The ultimate quote “He’s killing the soul of the company” - Bob Iger about Bob Chapek supposedly to “more than one confidant”.
 
https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney...uccessor-as-ceo-creating-tensions-11669165304

Fascinating article… LIkely written with high level leaks from Iger apologists/fans….

The article reads like a valentine to the Disney fan and cast member community….

Key takeaways:

- Chapek wanted to fire everybody in February 2020… Iger said, hold onto them until CARES act gives them worker protections.
- Iger thought Chapek was moving too quickly and making the parks too expensive.
- The ultimate quote “He’s killing the soul of the company” - Bob Iger about Bob Chapek supposedly to “more than one confidant”.
It's behind a paywall so I can't read it.
Nothing was shut down in February 2020, so why would he have wanted to fire everyone then? It wasn't until mid-March that everything closed.
 
https://www.wsj.com/articles/disney...uccessor-as-ceo-creating-tensions-11669165304

Fascinating article… LIkely written with high level leaks from Iger apologists/fans….

The article reads like a valentine to the Disney fan and cast member community….

Key takeaways:

- Chapek wanted to fire everybody in February 2020… Iger said, hold onto them until CARES act gives them worker protections.
- Iger thought Chapek was moving too quickly and making the parks too expensive.
- The ultimate quote “He’s killing the soul of the company” - Bob Iger about Bob Chapek supposedly to “more than one confidant”.
Board members are chatty right now. And honestly, Iger probably as well.
 
https://www.ft.com/content/6c0b203e...traffic/partner/feed_headline/us_yahoo/auddev

Disney should not be so reliant on one man
The company is not moving with the times when it comes to corporate governance best practice

Anna Nicolao

But forgotten amid the drama of these two men vying for control of one of the largest companies in the world, is the Disney board’s role in allowing any of this to happen.

Longtime Disney-watchers will notice that this is a sequel. In the 1990s, chief executive Michael Eisner installed Michael Ovitz as his presumed successor, but it later emerged in a court case that he told a colleague Ovitz was a “psychopath” and he got rid of him within 14 months.
 
New information here.

https://www.ft.com/content/c6175aba-3749-4515-bb47-9abdcc6504ec

Disney awarded Iger $10mn consultancy deal to advise CEO
Alex Barker in London and Anna Nicolaou in New York
11/23/22

Walt Disney last year awarded Bob Iger a $10mn deal to advise his successor Bob Chapek despite the two executives at the media company barely being on speaking terms.

“Iger never forgave Chapek for the way Chapek distanced himself and took control of the company,” they said. “In some ways, Iger thought he would still be the coach. Chapek was not willing.”
 
https://www.cinemablend.com/streami...looks-like-he-allegedly-made-some-shady-moves

As More Details About Bob Chapek’s Firing Come To Light, It Looks Like He Allegedly Made Some Shady Moves
Dirk Libbey
11/23/22

In a story in the Wall Street Journal (via WhatsOnDisneyPlus), it’s mentioned that the second season of The Mysterious Benedict Society, a Disney+ original series, was seeing its episodes debut on Disney Channel a day before they appeared on the streaming service. Something similar was apparently planned for the second season of Doogie Kameāloha, M.D. The reason for this, according to the report, was that by premiering the shows on Disney Channel, the production and marketing costs could be shifted to the cable channel, thus shrinking the costs of Disney+.

Walt Disney Company CFO Christin McCarthy was one of the people who was reportedly concerned about this shifting around of costs, she’s also one of the people who apparently had serious concerns about Chapek continuing as CEO and so it sounds like this may have contributed to that view.

If this reporting is accurate, and there’s no reason to believe it is not, then the whole thing is quite concerning. While shifting costs like this may not be strictly speaking illegal, it’s questionable at best. It looks like an intentional effort to make Disney+ look better financially than it actually was. It doesn’t change Disney’s bottom line, but it does make the segment of the company that has been the primary focus of the last two years look better than it is, which is not the sort of thing that stockholders and financial institutions tend to appreciate.
 

PixFuture Display Ad Tag












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top