Dean
DIS Veteran<br><a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis
- Joined
- Aug 19, 1999
- Messages
- 39,228
Technically that has always been the case. My best guess is that once thing's settle out we'll see a $5-10 reduction for most contracts, maybe a little more for the higher ones like BLT, BCV, etc. It may take a little longer to sell as well with a portion of potential buyers moving to retail purchases. If DVC were to abandon ROFR, it would have a much larger impact on sales long term than this change.WOW ! Maybe I am looking at this picture in the "long run" wrong......some one tell me that I am not, here goes;
Let say after that March cut off date, or any time there after , you get hard up for cash and you are force to sale and you go sale resale, what is your pts. value going to be worth. To me it looks like not very much.It looks like to me that DVC took the great impact of going to buy resale rather than DVC off the table.So to get as they say "all the bells and whisles", [every thing that is cutoff in March] by DvC you are forced to buy from them.........and there prices will go up more in no time. While the poor sucker can not get much at all trying to sale his on the resale market. CPA's Lawyers ....people in the "know"....tell me I am wrong.![]()
They don't have that option unless the broker is asleep at the wheel. You don't have to have ROFR to close, only give them the 30 opportunity.Also, wouldn't it be amazing if ROFR suddenly takes about two months to complete so that no one purchasing a resale now closes before the deadline?
Some have said this will have an effect on everyone and that's likely true but the effect will be positive for some. The only negative effect is for those looking to sell in the future, for most it's just a paper loss in a system that should never have been looked at as an investment. For some, it will be a buying opportunity.
IMO, one has to have the ability to look at the big picture and overlook certain issues to even participate in timesharing, DVC and otherwise. An extension of your second paragraph is that it's entirely possible that qualified members will see a better exchange rate in the future looking at those cash type exchanges, hopefully enough to make it a reasonable options for once. I'm sure the RCI contract does extend to all DVC members and if DVC's contract is like the one's I am familiar with, to exclude some members would likely cost DVC/DVD money, even after any renewal.I don't like the idea of "second class" ownership for resale purchasers. I think Disney is doing it more for it's benefit than our benefit. That being said, it doesn't surprise me.
If you look at what's being eliminated, it is the options where Disney gets the point then turns around and rents those units to the general public. Over the long run, this will lead to fewer points being used for Disney Collection, Cruises, etc. Which in turn would be fewer points for Disney to need to rent out.
RCI on the other hand is an exchange between members of DVC and members of a different timeshare. Disney is only acting as an intermediary between the owner and RCI. RCI is doing most of the work. I also wonder if RCI's contract with DVC grants membership to all owners and until the contract comes up for renewal they can't make changes to it.
I know some find this a slap in the face but I believe it will strengthen DVD as a company going forward. Better to have a job at 80% pay than no job at all so to speak.