hokiefan33 said:Canon is great...if it works. But if something goes wrong with it, you'll be without your camera for some time and you'll also be out some money, even if it's brand new.
Ours (Powershot SD400) started inserting vertical lines and overexposing the pictures, so we couldn't take any reliable pictures. It actually started acting up at WDW, and also at our baby dedication at church (not the 2 best times to have an ill-functioning camera!). The camera was outside of the normal electronics return policy at WalMart, so you have to go with Canon's limited warranty.
Basically, we are not allowed to take it to a Canon-authorized dealer, b/c apparently they aren't authorized to work on anything, only to sell. So we have to ship it to the 1 place in America that works on digital cameras, in Elk Grove Village, IL. We have to box it up, make sure that it won't be damaged enroute, insure it for value (b/c Canon makes real sure to tell you that THEY aren't liable for squat), and then wait 2-3 weeks once it gets to the factory for them to fix it. Of course, when you get it back, you better hope it is now working, b/c if it isn't, you have to go through that same process again. So not only did THEIR product break (not 3 months after we bought it), but WE have to pay to ship it to them ourselves, including insurance, and then we have to wait 3 weeks for it to be fixed. I called and inquired about them just sending me a new replacement camera, and you would have thought I asked for a stake in the company.
For a company that charges a premium price b/c of their name and their apparent quality, their service sure doesn't measure up. I will never buy another one again - and I'm giving you fair warning about what COULD happen to you if yours breaks!
MICKEY88 said:having worked retail for the largest Camera chain in the US...I can tell you that 3 weeks is good...the average camera repair takes 4-6 weeks ..usually being closer to 6...very few manufacturers of any prduct will just send you a new replacement rather than repairing your purchase..
in the future, buy your cameras from Ritz camera, and purchase their extended service policy, unless it has changed it covers damage from everything but fire, nuclear war and brackish water...
ducklite said:Sorry, but Ritz is a RIP OFF.
I am a professional photographer, and don't buy anything there.
I buy almost all my gear from an independent, but established camera store in a small town near Philly. I deal directly with the owner who gives me great deals, and even offers warranties on used gear. I bought a used 80-200 Nikor zoom from him, it was spotless clean and I paid roughly 30% of retail, and he guaranteed it for 30 days--even if I wanted to return it "just because". Try to get Ritz to offer deals like that! BTW--I've never stepped foot in the store, I buy everything from him over the phone and ahve it shipped.
Additionally, his dealer rep installed a firmware upgrade into my Nikon for free, because the dealer is a good customer, and so am I. At the chain stores, teh management has no idea who the manufacturer's reps are, as it's all done on a corporate level.
I buy my memory from Amazon, and certain accesories (bag, monopod, etc.) from whereever I find something that works for me.
Anne
ducklite said:Ritz only gives you ten days to return digital equipment.
Also, if you are using digital and Minolta, can I ask why? Don't get me wrong, for prosumer grade camera's, they've got a nice selection and good quality. I have a DiMage Z-1, handy little thing, easy to use, and nice quality. But for pro work, the range of lenses they offer for their DSLR's is so limiting--why would you choose Konica-Minolta over Canon or Nikon?
Anne
ducklite said:I took a very serious look at the 7D, but had two different sales people tell me that there were only three lens' that fit it. (This was six months ago when it first came out, maybe things have changed?) Ritz Camera in Quakerbridge Mall was one of them, and they didn't have it in stock.
I have two Minolta SLR's (35mm) in addition to my DiMage, and honestly feel that the Nikon glass is superior. I was a Minolta fan for years, but am glad that I bought Nikon for my DSLR. I do love my DiMage, IMHO Konica Minolta has a superior prosumer line above Nikon or Canon. But for DSLR, I'll keep the Nikon.
Anne
MICKEY88 said:bad sales people.... Minolta loaded their adds with info on the use of Maxxum lenses..for the 7D..they hyped the ability to use your existing lenses and not have to go buy new ones...Complete Line of Maxxum AF Lenses
The greatest advantage of an SLR camera lies in the ability to change lenses to suit a particular subject or shooting style. The Maxxum 7D is engineered to take full advantage of the superior optical technologies and powerfully versatile focal lengths incorporated into the Maxxum system of interchangeable AF lenses. Aspherical optics, AD (Anomalous Dispersion) glass, and multiple lens coatings, for example, all contribute to the beautifully crisp, high-contrast images Maxxum lenses are known for.
my 5600 flash works on it as well as the A2, my remote cord from my 9000Maxum works with them....
which 35mm slr's do you have,,,do you specialize in your photography or shoot everything...
the more you tell me about Ritz, the more I begin to believe that since they lost me as a sales associate they have suffered in quality....LOL
goofy4tink said:And to think that all I want is to be able to make my camera stop telling me to format the memory card!!! Man, some of you guys are incredibly 'with it' when it comes to digital. Wish I could become more proficient. Guess my Kodak Easyshare isn't going to cut it, is it? I'm looking to move up to the $250-300 range so I can hone the little bit of skills I have now. It's just that darn memory card thing. Great info you all. It does help out those of us like me.