diane feinstein-r.i.p.

[gmi3804]

I prefer the voters make that decision on when a certain politician has to go.

That's the perfect way for politicians to just mindlessly spout just what the voters want to hear. How's that working out?

 

[Kwami]

One thing I would like to see, but will never happen, is for the House members to have 4 year terms rather than the current 2. They get elected and after 6 months they are running for their next term. Too much time spent on electioneering. I am sure there was some good, logical reason for our framers to make it so short, but I am not aware of what that would be.

The idea was that members of the House would be more responsive to the will of the people if they had to keep asking for votes. A member who didn't represent his constituents well would be voted out in two years or less.

Turnover in the House is actually much higher than in the Senate, where members serve for six-year terms. It's not uncommon for a Senator to change the way that he votes in the 1-2 years leading up to an election. Earlier votes are forgotten and forgiven. That's much harder to pull off in the House.

 

[RedAngie]

One thing I would like to see, but will never happen, is for the House members to have 4 year terms rather than the current 2. They get elected and after 6 months they are running for their next term. Too much time spent on electioneering. I am sure there was some good, logical reason for our framers to make it so short, but I am not aware of what that would be.

I’d go with 5 year terms for both the House and Senate, with a maximum of two terms. Heck, the same for President too.

House elections would be one and six years after the census when necessary adjustments have been determined. So for after the 2020 census, have House elections in 2021 and 2026.

 

[Ms.Minnie]

I think in the House is where it could work. I think after 10-years, politicians become too entrenched, backed by too much money, have a tendency to become corrupt. Fresh ideas every 10-years hurts no one. The Senate is a completely different thing and feel that shouldn't change. Just my own thoughts....

I agree with most of what you said although there could possibly be debate on the 10 yrs for the House. I don't agree with leaving the Senate as is. Why do you feel that way? Two 6-year terms is 12 years, that's a long time. I think some of these politicians become out of touch with their constituents the more time they spend in DC.

 

[MillauFr]

That's the perfect way for politicians to just mindlessly spout just what the voters want to hear. How's that working out?

It works out fine for me. Voters get the exact leadership they deserve.

 

[Dan Murphy]

The idea was that members of the House would be more responsive to the will of the people if they had to keep asking for votes. A member who didn't represent his constituents well would be voted out in two years or less.

Turnover in the House is actually much higher than in the Senate, where members serve for six-year terms. It's not uncommon for a Senator to change the way that he votes in the 1-2 years leading up to an election. Earlier votes are forgotten and forgiven. That's much harder to pull off in the House.

Thanks

 

[maltdizzy]

I am sure there was some good, logical reason for our framers to make it so short, but I am not aware of what that would be.

Remember that back then you had to be a wealthy (male) landowner to vote or be eligible for office. You traveled and served for as little as 45 days a year and spent the rest of the time running your farms/businesses/institutions. You had better things to do then get tied to a long term.

 

[Lumpy1106]

Huh...
Page 3 already and no one has mentioned said out loud who else should not be in office based on age and acuity. OK, well, I'll start the list and believe me, this has nothing to do with politics;

• Chuck Schumer
• Joe Biden
• ...

I have a lot of respect for Mitt Romney for coming out and saying not only that he, in his 70's is too old to run for president, but also that it is time for the next generation to hold the position.

 

[Ms.Minnie]

Mick Jagger is the same age as our president. Do you think Mick is too old? LOL, not saying he should hold any political office but what a comparison.

 

[Lumpy1106]

Mick Jagger is the same age as our president. Do you think Mick is too old? LOL, not saying he should hold any political office but what a comparison.

It's a miracle that Mick Jagger is still alive. Don't do drugs kids. Alcohol is bad for you. Clean living, long life.
Oh wait a minute...

 

[soccerdad72]

Huh...
Page 3 already and no one has mentioned said out loud who else should not be in office based on age and acuity. OK, well, I'll start the list and believe me, this has nothing to do with politics;

• Chuck Schumer
• Joe Biden
• ...

I have a lot of respect for Mitt Romney for coming out and saying not only that he, in his 70's is too old to run for president, but also that it is time for the next generation to hold the position.

Mitch McConnell is the first one (now that Dianne has passed) that came to mind.

 

[Ms.Minnie]

It's a miracle that Mick Jagger is still alive. Don't do drugs kids. Alcohol is bad for you. Clean living, long life.
Oh wait a minute...

Yeah, I wouldn't recommend his lifestyle. Aalthough I have heard in later years he takes pretty good care of himself. Never too old to learn?

 

[Lumpy1106]

I prefer to see it this way - ask yourself; would I want this person refereeing my kids soccer game, or would that be too much for them to handle? OK, well, if not, what make them qualified to be elected to ANY elected position?

It's a fair question, and I think the country would be much better off if the house, senate and White House was filled with soccer referees.

 

[Lumpy1106]

Mitch McConnell is the first one (now that Dianne has passed) that came to mind.

Woops! That's who I meant. Chuck Schumer is only 66.

 

[HeatherC]

First of all, sorry to hear of her passing.

I disagree. Why prevent someone who is older(maybe wiser) from holding office if they're competent? My father is 92 and he could run circles around most people in office today regarding legislative issues. I hear what you're saying in this particular case(and others), but I'm not for limiting my choices -especially these days. Now, term limits that may be something on the table, especially in the House.

Problem is, she wasn’t competent. She had turned over all her personal affairs to her daughter but refused to resign. That should not be allowed to happen.

 

[Marrila]

Mick Jagger is the same age as our president. Do you think Mick is too old? LOL, not saying he should hold any political office but what a comparison.

I'll pass on Mick Jagger running for office. Good grief.

 

[HeatherC]

I'll pass on Mick Jagger running for office. Good grief.

Can’t be worse than half the bozos running the place now.(only kidding)

 

[Ms.Minnie]

Problem is, she wasn’t competent. She had turned over all her personal affairs to her daughter but refused to resign. That should not be allowed to happen.

Exactly why we need competency testing.

 

[Ms.Minnie]

I'll pass on Mick Jagger running for office. Good grief.

Really? That's what you got from that? Who suggested he should run for office?

 

[Lumpy1106]

I'll pass on Mick Jagger running for office. Good grief.

I feel like he would always have us under his thumb.
Do you think once he moved into the White House he'd want to paint it black?