DAS changes coming WDW May 20/ DL June 18, 2024

Have had DAS for years. I am legally blind with only peripheral vision. In the regular line I trip and fall or run into walls. I was told to sit outside and wait while my daughter went through the line alone and then a cast member would text me and come get me to meet my daughter. Didn’t even make it to the so-called professional representative. Have they hired that many extra cast members? They certainly took the family time out of family vacation. Universal will be getting more business from my family. I have no problem proving my disability, and there is no magic in Disney anymore. So sad!
I know the lightening lane line may be a shorter distance to the ride, but wouldn’t you have similar issues in any line?

Also, I was thinking, the stand bye line typically moves slower so it might be easier/safer to walk through. People walk much faster through the lightning lane lines.
 
Why? We have to disclose pretty sensitive medical information. It's the least they can do.
There is no need to disclose "sensitive medical information" unless you choose to do so. "Needs" are not the same thing -- simply explain your needs related to a standard queue environment. You do not have to share diagnosis, treatments, therapies, test results, etc.
 

But this is no different between families with disabilities and those without. So unless you want to say EVERYONE is being excluded, it's not exclusion to say everyone has to use the same rules. They are working on a middle ground so everyone is able to access the parks, which includes not giving people starting at a disadvantage so much accommodation they have an advantage, which is definitely complicated.
It is different though because a family without disabilities can all wait together for the attraction, under Disney’s new rules, those with disabilities must wait separately form the remainder of their group, this is indeed by very definition exclusion.
 
I know the lightening lane line may be a shorter distance to the ride, but wouldn’t you have similar issues in any line?

Also, I was thinking, the stand bye line typically moves slower so it might be easier/safer to walk through. People walk much faster through the lightning lane lines.
It depends on the needs, but generally speaking, for many the fact that it is a shorter distance and shorter wait does make a difference, in some cases, even when the wait times are the same, the distance makes a difference. For example, DH can’t do Soarin’ at EPCOT anymore (lightning lane or Stand By) because of how insanely long the queue is in either case, but at DCA can, but generally not on the standby side because of all of the switchbacks (if the line starts inside the building, he is fine, but then that’s the same as Lightning Lane at that point). Kilimanjaro Safari, we realized neither of us can handle the standby queue, even if there is no one in line when we got into it because it was the first ride of the day and there was no line, it was before park opening when it opened, so the system didn’t let us get a DAS return time. Just not an option due to the queue setup, even when it is moving slowly.
 
It is different though because a family without disabilities can all wait together for the attraction, under Disney’s new rules, those with disabilities must wait separately form the remainder of their group, this is indeed by very definition exclusion.
Families without disabilities spend years being separated while waiting for an attraction if they have a child who is too short to ride it. And while I'm not a lawyer, I don't think the argument "OK, Disney's accommodations allow people with disabilities to do the rides, and they can ride at the same time as the other members of their party, BUT that's not enough, they also need to allow us to all stay together all the time we are waiting in line" will get much traction, legally.
 
It is different though because a family without disabilities can all wait together for the attraction, under Disney’s new rules, those with disabilities must wait separately form the remainder of their group, this is indeed by very definition exclusion.
Disney isn't forcing those with disabilities to split from their groups. Groups can choose not to use the available accommodations and find other ways to stay together 100% of the time.
 
THE SOLE ISSUES are is this a qualifying developmental disability or similar and how does this impact going through the Disney attraction stand-by line

So first, I'm just going to say I'm not at all debating the idea that all families are required to share is need. 💯 on that page.

But. The bolded in your explanation is flawed, as the bolded is talking about having enough medical knowledge to be able to say whether it's a qualifying developmental disability (to be clear, I think all the CMs are doing is the latter - how does their unnamed disability impact them in line).

There are so many various reasons for developmental disabilities, it wouldn't be prudent for Disney to have a list of specific diagnoses (nor do I think they do), and given that they don't ask diagnosis, there's no way for a medical professional say this is a "qualifying developmental disability" either.
 
Families without disabilities spend years being separated while waiting for an attraction if they have a child who is too short to ride it. And while I'm not a lawyer, I don't think the argument "OK, Disney's accommodations allow people with disabilities to do the rides, and they can ride at the same time as the other members of their party, BUT that's not enough, they also need to allow us to all stay together all the time we are waiting in line" will get much traction, legally.
There really is a difference between an objective safety issue (too short), and a disability accommodation for people who meet the objective safety standards , however.
 
It got severely taken advantage of and was causing the system problems for the people who genuinely need it.
That’s the general consensus among most it seems. Saddens me to read many comments on FB wherein people are gleefully celebrating the changes and often being beyond cruel to people who are denied. I’m sure it’s causing many who had DAS extra stress. I give them grace, they will eventually come to terms with it. Sometimes people just want to be vent/be heard.

If you think you were unable to communicate your needs properly or the CM didn't understand it, should you only get one chance of getting approved?
Of course not. Nor, should those who symptoms change or accelerate also be forbidden from reapplying.

Would be nice to hear that those that have tried the recommended options given to them by the CMs, would be fully permitted to discuss their concerns going forward if things didn’t work out well for them.
Some may notice I don’t even like calling it a disability. I’m very guilty of downplaying the severity simply because I don’t want to recognize it myself. Talking about the particulars of it with a seasoned professional that I’ve known a long time now and trust is already hard - doing the same with not only a stranger, but with the weight of knowing the stranger holds all of the “power” vis-a-vis approving or denying DAS? Extraordinarily hard.
Not intended to pry as to your disability at all.

many women with autism/ADHD have been coached/developed camouflaging & self coping behaviors in order to mask to fit into society…generally, only for a limited time a day such as work situations etc.

My daughter has had DAS since it began and also had GAC (the previous program before that). We always were aware that having been approved in the past did not guarantee approval in the future. I was always nervous calling because of that and will be nervous again next time. I don’t know whether or not she will be approved in the future. Hope so, but not counting it as a given
Exactly. I’ve been very surprised during this transition period to read so many comments from people who freely stated “they know they qualify” etc. whether it’s referencing under the past system or the new one. I don’t think anyone can truly predict their outcome, especially now
Yes, CMs are definitely able to approve DAS without the HCP.
I stepped away from thread for a few days. In this vein, are CMs also able to outright deny DAS and refuse to let the applicant speak to the HCP?
 
It is different though because a family without disabilities can all wait together for the attraction, under Disney’s new rules, those with disabilities must wait separately form the remainder of their group, this is indeed by very definition exclusion.
There are countless reasons why families with or without disabilities cannot wait together or ride certain rides together…..claustrophobia, back issues, pregnancy, motion sickness, being afraid of heights, simply being afraid of something in the queue or being afraid of the ride. etc….

We all need to make compromises.
 
I stepped away from thread for a few days. In this vein, are CMs also able to outright deny DAS and refuse to let the applicant speak to the HCP?

I don't think I have heard any accounts of a CM refusing to let you talk to the Inspire Health people.

Actually, in contrast to what I had originally posted (I did post an update to my earlier post) - instead of a "permanent denial", if you do call back again for DAS after being denied by a CM, I have read at least 1 account where the CM has said they could not make the decision and that you need to talk to the Inspire Health person. So it seems like you should have the option to talk to someone from Inspire Health, even if it might require a second video call.

That sounds like it makes more sense in the case of a change in your needs.

It does seem like more people are being referred to the Inspire Health people (but that may just be based on people posting). I do wonder how many Inspire Health people they have versus CMs for the video chat. I have to assume there are less Inspire Health people, which makes me wonder if this will create a bottleneck if more people are being sent to them.
 
There are countless reasons why families with or without disabilities cannot wait together or ride certain rides together…..claustrophobia, back issues, pregnancy, motion sickness, being afraid of heights, simply being afraid of something in the queue or being afraid of the ride. etc….

We all need to make compromises.
As someone who took two kids under 5 without DAS for years and then developed a condition that (previously) qualified for in the past 2 years, I think a lot of DAS families aren’t aware, have forgotten, or completely discount how challenging the parks (especially queues) are for other guests. Some of the conditions listed above are actually disabilities but queues can be very challenging for an non-disabled groups too, imagine an able bodied (but not especially burly) single mom with a 9mo old and 3 year old— with current park waits, they probably can’t do many rides when everything requires 30+ minute rides as they are required to be holding an infant while wrangling a toddler.

I know that most people here are deeply cynical it will help standby times, but I am hopeful it will actually bring many of the rides that are currently 20-30m waits back to 10-20 minute waits for all guests if people can’t just grab a LL for a people eater ride from across the park…I also think the headliner waits may shrink a bit if they are not giving as much capacity to LL returns…but I could also see Disney just trying to improve G+ and allocating more return times to the headliners that sell out of LLs before noon.
 
There really is a difference between an objective safety issue (too short), and a disability accommodation for people who meet the objective safety standards , however.
However, by requesting DAS (or an accommodation to avoid the queue) isn't the disabled individual implying the queue is "not safe" for that individual? I use quotes there because I fully realize it isn't the same safety issue. But a too short child actually isn't unsafe in the queue, they are unsafe to ride and Disney prefers to keep them completely out of the queue to make loading the ride easier. By that comparison, the queue itself is the problem for the disabled individual but not for the short child -- yet the child is absolutely excluded from being in the queue.
 
I stepped away from thread for a few days. In this vein, are CMs also able to outright deny DAS and refuse to let the applicant speak to the HCP?
Yes, to my knowledge a CM can deny DAS without asking an HCP to be involved. I'm not sure if there is a process to request an HCP be involved but would assume so.

Would be nice to hear that those that have tried the recommended options given to them by the CMs, would be fully permitted to discuss their concerns going forward if things didn’t work out well for them.
I have seen at least a couple of reports where individuals were denied DAS, arrived at the park and tried the alternative accommodations, and then were able to reconnect and explain why it didn't work. I think some of the "don't call back" is now coming from the perspective of too many people trying to "shop" CMs and find one that will give them DAS if they ask enough times. If someone truly feels they messed up their initial call, needed to get their thoughts in order, and reconnects - I hope that is allowed. As PP mentioned, likely to include an HCP at that point. Likewise, if DAS is denied and a guest can show true effort to make the alternate accommodations work but unsuccessful -- yes they can reconnect and again likely with an HCP+CM combo.
 
I have seen at least a couple of reports where individuals were denied DAS, arrived at the park and tried the alternative accommodations, and then were able to reconnect and explain why it didn't work. I think some of the "don't call back" is now coming from the perspective of too many people trying to "shop" CMs and find one that will give them DAS if they ask enough times. If someone truly feels they messed up their initial call, needed to get their thoughts in order, and reconnects - I hope that is allowed. As PP mentioned, likely to include an HCP at that point. Likewise, if DAS is denied and a guest can show true effort to make the alternate accommodations work but unsuccessful -- yes they can reconnect and again likely with an HCP+CM combo.

This is what I am hoping for. Even in the case of not getting DAS, I will definitely give the alternatives a fair shake for one day. And will try to help accomodate my mom as well. And if it doesn't work then I am giving a call back the next day immediately.

Unlike those who visit often, there are people like us who haven't visited for what would be seven years when we do, and it will probably be another long stretch of time until we do again. I can only really allow one day for experimenting [with hopefully positive results with other accomodations in the case of a denial!] before our once in a blue moon vacation is just money being drained away and wasted.

I am more hopeful than not if denied though that other accomodations will work, but I do hope for others that find the other accomodations to not work for x, y, and z once they tried it that they can give a call back and explain without being told they were denied already.
 












Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top