I’ve rewritten this like 3 times, because I’m being sensitive, but I don’t think your wrong keishashadow.
the demographics I mentioned would likely not be interested in a vaccine passport.
But that begs the question. If they are required, for how long? Poor people watch Disney channel just like other income levels. Poor kids beg to have a mickey stuffy from the
Walmart toy aisle because they don’t understand they’re poor. Those parents might try to figure out a budget vacation. I’m not trying to be defensive, just realistic. Would Disney truly be only for an “elite class”?
These people, especially Florida and Georgia residents who can drive, would be interested in a once in a lifetime trip. I know this because I taught at a title one school. Not all of the students got to go, but about 50% of them went for at least one day as a very special vacation. I know you didn’t imply anything- but for anyone else reading- these demographics still want travel even if they can’t afford it. Everyone wants the best for their kids. Sometimes that BBB at Disney springs and dinner at trex because tickets are too expensive. Should they be denied the right to try to find a magical trip option?
secondly, and while not theme park related, could these passports snowball into a requirement for everything travel and pleasure related (sports, movies etc?). Would the gov step in with door to door workers explaining grants for phones and how to qualify? An option, but one that would take some time to target those with the highest needs.
I know two demographics that have been growing in 2020 that would be interested in theme parks.
my relative had to give up her Smart phone cell phone because online shopping
caused bankruptcy.
My DH coworker also gave up his smart phone cell phone do to a porn addiction. Both of these happened in 2020 and I’m seeing more mentions of it online in my friends circles about intentionally unplugging. How would they travel... or would they forgo travel to stay free from their addictions? Maybe a trusted friend could carry their passport?
again, deep conversation for a forum, and you are right about the paper passports being easy to fudge, but this is such a complicated question I don’t know how they’d have a fair solution by the summer or fall that will satisfy the rights of the US courts without committing some pretty hefty discrimination. 20% is a large number, not something that they could justify as being for the greater good. So how do they lower that number? How do they lower that number in a quick amount of time? Hopefully someone smarter than me has these answers!