And I, for one, do not think Disney is so infallible that the OP might have struck out with the waitstaff, the headwaiter, or whoever else he spoke with. Maybe, like my husband and I, he decided in the end that in order NOT to ruin his trip, the best thing to do was leave it at that and move on with the 4 days, writing a letter when he got home.
Makes sense to me.
I certainly do not think that Disney is infallible - and as I said earlier, I do not doubt for a moment that the OP had a miserable dining experience. The problem, as I see it, is the "considerations" or financial compensation that the OP apparently seeks. It seems all too common now that when an experience does not live up to our
subjective standards of quality, many of us expect a monetary response. That simply doesn't make sense to me.
Disney did respond to the OP after receiving his letter. We can argue about whether the response was proper, but Disney obviously investigated the collective surveys from its guests on that particular cruise as it related to dining. Apparently, the OP's experience was the exception, and not the rule, because
objectively those on board for that cruise overwhelmingly enjoyed their dining experience (95%). That doesn't mean that the OP's experience was enjoyable, but it probably means that there wasn't a widespread systemic dining problem which would warrant giving discounts on future cruises or cash refunds (as the cruise industry sometimes does in response to particularly widespread and extremely bad cruise experiences).
Dining, unfortunately, is purely subjective, both in wait times, menu choices and food quality (unlike something objective, like plumbing or electrical problems which affect many cabins). Post #15 from disneyelaine states that she feels that
DCL dining room food is not particularly good and that Holland America's is the equivalent to Palo's. That is a very subjective statement to which she is entitled (I've been on eight DCL cruises and believe that DCL's dining room food has done nothing but improve since my first cruise in 1999 and that Holland America's food was no better than, and in many ways was inferior to, DCL's dining room fare [not to mention that Holland America's upscale "Palo" restaurant equivalent paled in comparison to Palo on DCL]). Nevertheless, each of us has his or her own subjective beliefs about what is and what is not a good dining room experience. I happened to be on the Wonder's 10-day Southern Caribbean cruise last September and, even though our wait in the dining room for entrees was lengthy and we were always one of the last tables served and exiting from the second seating, none of our group felt that this was a problem - it didn't even cross our minds because we were enjoying each other's company, the fact that we were on a big, beautiful ship floating majestically in the middle of the ocean on vacation. Again, subjectivity wins out.
The point is that neither DCL (nor any other cruise line) is going to please each one of its guests no matter what it does with its food service - it's not an objective standard. The OP has every right to complain, both onboard and after debarkation, has every right to use that experience to decide whether he or she will cruise again with DCL and even has the right to feel a different response should have been given once he lodged his complaint. But to expect monetary compensation for this very private, and by all accounts isolated experience, appears to carry the "entitlement" mentality just a bit too far, IMHO.