MushyMushy
Marseeya Here!
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2006
- Messages
- 13,072
I understand some of the points many are trying to make about how the child will have lost so much already. However, nobody seems to have a problem with changing an internationally adopted child's name to something more "American." These childen have also lost a lot, so how is that any different? Believe me, we have no intention of trying to pretend that this child doesn't have a past. We will be very dilligent in trying to help this child have a connection to his/her past all throughout his life.
I don't think there is a difference, personally.
It sounds as if you have your mind pretty strongly made up on the name issue. But think about it -- is this really something you want to do for the child? Or is it something you're just doing for yourself? Maybe a control issue of sorts?
A name is such a personal thing to each of us, and a child may see you discarding their old name as a way of discarding their identity. At two, they may not think of it like that, but when they are old enough to know?
I just think it's a bad idea. I wish my parents had never changed my name. I often think about changing it back because it was MINE and I feel that they had no right to do that to me. I'm 41 years old, and it still confuses me.
I don't know if changing the child's name is the right thing to do. But, I do understand the dilemma. It looks as though you and your DH are giving it a lot of thought and it shows that you want to do the right thing for the child. You guys have a lot of heart. 

