Mosoh
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2011
- Messages
- 556
Mosoh said:So you agree that George knows what happened, or that no matter what time ICA got home and found her daughter missing she should have reported it. You didn't believe anything George said on the stand - includng there was no accidental drowning he was aware of. Plus to put her to death based on the evidence was not warrented - they should have included lesser charges, too? Oh, and the the whole family was covering up an accident. Not to forget that no one really knows who was her caretaker and when she died in whose care?
Maybe no one agrees however, it could have happened-reasonable doubt.
Cindy is a shrew and I have zero problem believing that George would keep things from her if only as a means of his self protection.
All those are arguments used to defend the verdict from the jurors mouths.
If you can find anywhere in the trial testimony where any of the statements above were argued or put into evidence I would agree. I don't think you'll be able to because they are not part of the testimony or evidence ....they misunderstood not only the guidelines but also the friggin' testimony.rie'smom said:We must have read and /or heard different words because from what I heard, they followed exactly the guidelines presented to them by Judge Perry.