- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 5,903
The enormous dynamic range of the Sony 16mp sensor as found in the K-5/K-50/K-500, D7000, and a handful of Sonys, means that you don't need to do HDR.
At least at relatively low ISOs. If you need more DR than you can pull from that sensor, you're probably producing those eye-bleeding over-the-top HDRs that were in vogue a few years ago and thankfully are fading away now.
Best beginner's camera article at DP Review
I would still take a look at the Fuji mirrorless models; I haven't used one but the owners seem completely smitten and and it's only real negative is that the RAW files are tough to deal with, which only affects you if you don't shoot JPG files - supposed its jpg out is fantastic. If I were just starting out, I would look long and hard at them; much as I love proper SLRs, I do think that mirrorless is the future, along with very high-quality digital viewfinders, so that the handling is similar to a proper SLR. (I hate shooting without the camera up to my eye!)

Best beginner's camera article at DP Review
I would still take a look at the Fuji mirrorless models; I haven't used one but the owners seem completely smitten and and it's only real negative is that the RAW files are tough to deal with, which only affects you if you don't shoot JPG files - supposed its jpg out is fantastic. If I were just starting out, I would look long and hard at them; much as I love proper SLRs, I do think that mirrorless is the future, along with very high-quality digital viewfinders, so that the handling is similar to a proper SLR. (I hate shooting without the camera up to my eye!)