I have repeated over and over that we want her there for babysitting only once in a while, but mainly because we've taken past trips with her and had a lot of fun!
Maybe you did, and maybe mom now "gets it" based on your new revised plan. But the feeling I got from your original post was one of entitlement: "I'm paying for the trip so mom should do exactly what I want her to do when I want her to do it. How dare she ask for some time or space to herself???"
Maybe mom picked up on a vibe like that no matter what your words said.
I must be the most spoiled DIL in the world. This September will be the third year in a row that my DMIL will be joining us on a Disney trip. She pays for room, park tickets, dining (which will be free this year), airfare for herself and my DS5. I pay for DH and myself, and then DD2.5 and DS1 are free. She gets a seperate room for DS and herself (we've only stayed at value). And she is constantly helping us with the kids while we are there, including things the first year when she stayed at hotel with the kids one night (they were 3 and 18 months that year) so DH and I could go out to pleasure island, last year she stayed back so baby & herself could take a nap a couple mid-days while DH and I took the older two kids to the pool.
She also lets (actually she expects) me to make all the plans, because she says she doesnt know anyone know could plan our trip as well as I do as far as dining, park plans, evening activites. I usually ask her input during my planning process, but she always says whatever I think we will all enjoy.
Now we have never asked (nor expected) her for money towards the trip, babysitting, etc. She wont go on the trip unless we let her pay for herself & DS. If she ever asked for a little alone time we would absolutely want her to have some time to relax, but she seems to want to spend all her time with the kids/us. We want her to enjoy herself and for the children to enjoy being with her. And she always is soooo excited to be coming and spending time with us. These are also her ONLY grand-children, and her husband is gone too, so at home she is alone alot, so she dedicates ALOT of time to my kids. We consider ourselves to be SUPER lucky, and after readin the original post here I consider myself even that much MORE lucky now! But I am still having a hard time understanding how so many posters can be so nasty to the original poster.
**Side note, DMIL is also no spring chicken, she is 65-years old and really keeps up all three grandkids!!
The difference in your case v. the OP's case comes down to one of
choice. Who decides what Gramma does? Gramma or Mommy? If it's Gramma, then that's great - if Gramma's offer & Mommy's wants/needs mesh, everyone's happy. But if they don't, who decides? Suppose Gramma pays and then says, "Oh, I made an appointment for DD at BBB, and I'm going to take while you watch the baby." How many mothers would be happy with that? No discussion, no choice.
In your case, you have the good fortune that your needs and her wishes mesh. But I've read posts about the "pushy grandmothers" who insist on babysitting when parents don't want them to.
Come on people she's not asking for her mom to be a nanny just asking her to help her out a little by staying with the 1 year old while while it naps. Why doesn't Grandma want to spend some alone time with her grand child anyway? It's not that hard looking after a sleeping one year old, grandma also gets a break out of the heat for a couple of hours.
Mom also said she would like a little alone time with her DH, not all the time alone with him. Mom said she was planning on taking the 5 year old to the kids club. If she puts the one year old down before they go out Grandma has nothing to do but sit back and rest. She did after all say she wanted some alone time, there ya go. Mom didn't say that she wanted to go out every night with DH just an evening. That's pretty fair.
Because
you are deciding that watching the 1 year old while it naps is spending "alone time" with the grandchild. It's not. Interaction is. You're also deciding that grandma wants a break out of the heat at the same time that 1 year old does. And it's not that easy staying with a napping child
in the same room. Is the 1 year old a light sleeper? Can grandma have a light on to read, or the TV on, or does she have to sit in the dark? Not all grandmas need afternoon naps, you know.
Or maybe grandma could take the 5 year old swimming and mom stays with the baby? Why doesn't mom want "alone time" with the 1 year old? Oh, yeah, because the 1 year oldwill be sleeping, so that's not "alone time."
Same for the evening out. How do you know that grandma wouldn't also like to play with the 5 year old? That would be "alone time" - grandma takes 5 year old to dinner and you get a babysitter for the 1 year old.
It's always a question of who is making the final decision. Unless the OP and her mother
agree on what the expectations are, and discuss what they'd prefer ("Mom, I was thinking that Dan & I would like to go for a nice dinner on the last night we're there. Would you mind watching both kids? How do you feel about that? Would you rather we take Sam to the kid's club and you watch the baby? Or would you like to take Sam and we'll get a babysitter for the baby? Or would you prefer a different night and our last night is spent as as family?") Negotiation is the key to family harmony - everyone gets what she wants.