If you're not willing to take an intelligent look into the significance of Obama's faith -how he has practiced it, been guided by it, and may be informed in the future by it -then there is really nothing to be learned. Not everything can be reduced to elementary syllogisms, followed by a smiley, and dismissed in the usual course of gotcha politics.
Point well taken . . . even if gotcha politics is most of what gets played.
How do you propose we deal with what he says in his books and his speeches and in his votes that is at odds with what Pastor Wright said in some speeches? Do we surmise that he is in full agreement with the pastor? Or do we look at how he has voted on issues? Or do we look at the larger denomination. Trinity is not a "one off" church and the UCC has a pretty long American history.
Trinity says it is:
A congregation committed to ADORATION.
A congregation preaching SALVATION.
A congregation actively seeking RECONCILIATION.
A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.
A congregation committed to BIBLICAL EDUCATION.
A congregation committed to CULTURAL EDUCATION.
A congregation committed to the HISTORICAL EDUCATION OF AFRICAN PEOPLE IN DIASPORA.
A congregation committed to LIBERATION.
A congregation committed to RESTORATION.
A congregation working towards ECONOMIC PARITY.
Do we accept that?
I don't presume that every Catholic is full agreement with the Holy See. Aren't there disagreements (based on votes) what has led some Bishops to state certain elected officials should be denied Communion.
What do we make of another candidate "checking off" names on some list. Does he respect those names for their beliefs and public statements? Or is it just a cynical attempt to win more votes.
Just which parts of UCC and the statements about the congregation are the parts that Sen Obama derives his faith from? I don't presume to know. But I wonder if it is that this about the denomination . . . "Many UCC churches trace their founding to the early 1600s, when the Pilgrims and Puritans first came to America. These Congregationalists, as they became known, sought religious independence from persecuting political authorities in Europe. They believed firmly in local church autonomy, covenantal church life, personal piety and the priesthood of all believers.
Today, the UCC holds firmly to these early religious tenets. Often recognized for its historical and contemporary social justice commitments, its present-day approach to worship, however, might be considered traditional by most standards."
http://www.ucc.org/news/thomas-denounces-smear-1.html
Or this - UCC-supported Churches for Middle East Peace: 'Terrorism never acceptable or justifiable' . . .
http://www.ucc.org/news/ucc-supported-churches-for.html
Or this - Illinois churches ministering in response to NIU shootings . . .
http://www.ucc.org/news/illinois-churches-ministering.html
Or this - Seeking an end to millenniums-old feud, UCC announces advertising outreach to scientists . . .
http://www.ucc.org/news/seeking-an-end-to.html
Or even this - Prayer journals, dedicated at Amistad Chapel, now heading to UCC chaplains in Iraq . . .
http://www.ucc.org/news/prayer-journals-dedicated-at.html
just wondering.