Question: Why did the church leaders ask Barb if she was wearing her undergarments? Or words to that effect. Just curious.
Didn't watch, so I don't know the context you are talking about, but found this from an LDs member who did. Perhaps this can explain it more.
(Sorry in advance for length) To answer some questions already posted and possibly preemptively answer some others: This would not have been the first time Barb went through the temple for the "endowment ceremony". She most probably would have received them initially just prior to a temple marriage sealing ceremony, before a mission, etc. That first time is for one's self, subsequent visits are to perform the rites by proxy for the deceased (see the discussions a few weeks back re: Baptism for the dead). Return visits to the temple are not only possible but recommended and somewhat expected both for the proxy work to move forward and for the spiritual edification and increased understanding of the participant.
Now: Did it ring true? The "your fifteen mins. are up" sure as hell didn't. There's no time limit in the celestial room; the only time anything like that has happened to me was when it was the last session of the day and they were closing down.
Likewise this whole business of "outer darkness" shows a fundamental misunderstanding of Mormon cosmology. Outer Darkness is almost impossible for someone to find themselves consigned to.
As for the church court, I've never been in one but the way the Stake President was going about it was very specious. Gestapo tactics and panic over tape recorders!?!? Doesn't ring true to my experience but mine is but one. And a church leader in that context asking a person if they've been wearing their garments would not be understood by either party to be out of line or overly personal for anyone in that room, esp. Barb. The issue was the degree to which she's been living/abiding by her covenants, one of which is covenanting to wear your garments after you've initially gone through the endowment for yourself.
I've also not heard of random church courts being called for random inactive members. Church courts are typically for people who are actively involved in the church community and actively involved in activities that are severely contrary to Mormon standards. I.e. adulterers, child molesters, and in some cases activists who are severely undermining church positions from within and without. Even then it should be noted that excommunication means your name is removed from the records and you can't participate in certain aspects of worship. The "don't let the door hit you in the rear on your way out" addition of "and no more sealing or temple blessings for YOU!" seemed excessive, at least in the tone in which it was delivered. Again, I have not been excommunicated so perhaps fellow mormon, ex-mormon, quasi-mormon, etc. posters can divulge.
Additionally, the thought of Barb being dead set to go to the temple and stealing a recommend to do so after 7 years of inactivity...was a stretch. Someone as paranoid about "going to outer darkness" or otherwise pissing off the Almighty as Barb in this episode isn't going to compound things with sneaking into the temple---which is a big no-no for a mormon.
Last, and to second what I posted last week, I don't think depicting the temple ordinances and "secret handshakes" and so on was necessary or dramatically justified. Celestial Room scene didn't bother me, I don't know why they couldn't have just started the scene there since there was nothing plot or character advancing in the ordinances. Seems a very cheap "shock theater" shot on the part of the show. Likewise the increasing "hard *** mormons" thing is seeming pointlessly mean spirited and axe grinding. Even though Bill is clearly a delusional prick, the degree to which his attitude of "the church proper is no different from Roman" is shared by the writers are unfortunate. These are steps in the wrong direction for the show, at least for a Mormon who doesn't like cartoonish, schematic depictions of persons (of his faith or otherwise) where nuance and dimension were previously the norm.