It’s a lot of resorts on Bay Lake now. I think transportation will be something that will require some investment? Is there any chance we could see a skyliner link to Epcot or any other option like that?
I am doubtful that Disney will ever create a Skyliner to Disney Springs... the parking loophole would be too significant....Skyliner wouldn't be that useful. Its a smaller number of rooms very spread out.
Skyliner today services: 6700 Rooms
All of Bay Lake: 5673 Rooms+Campsites
Example are you having people take a boat from WL and GF to a Skyliner at Contemporary?
If they are adding a skyliner it would be to Disney Spring or to AK from the existing area. That being said Disney seems to refuse to run the system in weather (like it likely is designed for) so its not as useful as it could be which is sad.
Agree. Very little or negative payoff for the expense incurred (even more incentive for people to stay in good neighbor hotels/offsite rather than on property).I am doubtful that Disney will ever create a Skyliner to Disney Springs... the parking loophole would be too significant....
I’ve been wondering about the guest road access first and foremost.Transportation.... what is the plan with this?
Time to rename this thread?![]()
Oh its drop dead easy. You scan the individual and if they don't have a resort reservation they are not allowed on the Skyliner.I am doubtful that Disney will ever create a Skyliner to Disney Springs... the parking loophole would be too significant....
Love it!I aim to please
I guess you have more faith in the people that have key card readers all over the grand Floridian that are deactivated and let everyone roam around the buildings and pools more than I do….Oh its drop dead easy. You scan the individual and if they don't have a resort reservation they are not allowed on the Skyliner.
They are unlikely to do it because of the downtime from storms not because of something that is extremely solvable and would be cost savings over having all the bussing.
They could try phasing it. A new DVC and cash High End Deluxe seems more Chapek’s speed than D’Amaro for whatever it is worth.Are we thinking this stays with the original 900 rooms or something smaller?
I’ve been wondering about the guest road access first and foremost.
It doesn’t make sense to route people through the Fort, buses or driving guests. Best access would be the same entry road as Wilderness Lodge, and then routing people around to Lakeside… kind of like Jambo and Kidani.
I don’t know if this would entail moving the “gate” at WL to a different spot, or if it would serve both WL and LL kind of like AKL does for both buildings. The other thing to consider is I think the big WL arch is ahead of the gatehouse?
View attachment 916121
I suspect they've changed next to nothing. It was designed, site prep had started, it was paused, and it has been resumed.Are we thinking this stays with the original 900 rooms or something smaller?
I think there's a non-zero chance it could actually be higher than the 900 in the original plans.Are we thinking this stays with the original 900 rooms or something smaller?
This is my bet. Exactly the same room configuration, with the hotel rooms being "resort studios." No reason to pay the architects (and, more importantly, Imagineering) twice.Disney appears out of the business of building new non-DVC resorts, so the hotel side (of mostly 1-bay hotel rooms) might be consumed and be the influx of Studios to get to a 'modern mix', with minimal changes to the originally-DVC side
Yes, this. So much this. The lazy river is one of the things I'm most excited about, and it better still be a part of this resort.As long as it stands for Long Lazy River, I'm good.