I've got mixed feelings about your comments. Whilst I can buy in to the spirit of what you're trying to articulate, the pedant in me feels compelled to pick apart your argument.
During our most recent stay at Saratoga Springs, we took a walk over to Old Key West and this is an excerpt from my trip report expressing my thoughts (which seem to mirror your own):
Weve yet to visit Key West proper, but the area around the Hospitality House definitely has an island vibe and its easy to imagine that you could be in the Key West of a bygone era. There arent many corners of WDW that we havent visited and, seeing something for the first time does remind you of just how inventive and imaginative the theming is. Its so easy to get blasé about it all, but I imagine that when this resort opened back in 1991, it must have been mind-blowing. I do remember seeing publicity material for it during my first visit in 1992 (in fact, I think I still have the brochure). Back then, even the notion of staying onsite seemed like an unrealisable dream, let alone owning timeshare in it.
During the same trip, we also spent time at the BoardWalk and these were my observations:
This is the first time weve stayed here and not had a BoardWalk view. It's seen better days, too and is well overdue for refurbishment, but, as Ive already mentioned, were just happy to be within walking distance of Epcot for the Food and Wine Festival.
WDW hotels are categorically not of the standard of genuinely deluxe resorts. They pale in comparison to several within very close proximity. It's
all about location at WDW and that's why they can charge inflated rates. Kidani Village is a very likely candidate for part of our next trip, but mainly because we love staying at new resorts. Its location is definitely a major factor when weighing up the pros and cons of each resort. Taking that into consideration when making a choice doesn't constitute moaning.
We had shabby rooms during our most recent stays at both BCV and BWV and that's just unacceptable. It's bad enough for us as DVC Members given that's why we pay dues, but for regular paying guests (you know, those ones who pay a FORTUNE), it's nothing short of an outrage. It's absolutely our responsibility to complain about rooms which aren't up to standard.
Heading further into hair-splitting territory, DVC ownership doesn't allow you to choose from all the DVC properties at will. It's becoming increasingly more difficult to secure certain locations at the 7 month window. Even when you do get what you want, it's invariably after a long and stressful wait. The waitlist system creates unnecessary blockages. A simple move from the current "domino" system to a "matching" system would remove that problem.
So, I agree with your sentiment, but not with some of the minutiae.
