Rafiki Rafiki Rafiki
<font color=peach>I took matters into my own hands
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2000
- Messages
- 4,130
I was on a phone interview for a job tonight and was asked if I preferred to work in a team setting or independently.
I know the answer is ALWAYS supposed to be "team work is always best," but I don't really get that.
What do you think? Is your company's model setup in teams of workers, or does everyone work independently? Do you like having a boss breathing down your neck to be sure you dot every i and cross every t?
I've worked both ways but always accomplish much bigger things when left alone to do them. I just wonder if I'm alone in that thought.
I remember not getting a job at Acxiom in Arkansas after not answering that question correctly. Their company model has (or had, it's been a lot of years) pods of people who work together doing the same job; work is assigned to the group and the group is held liable for the totality of the work. If there is a slacker on the team, the team is left to deal with the problem of the slacker.
It could be a substantial period of time before someone gets fired for not doing his/her part on the team...but in the meantime, the whole team suffers.
What do you think? Is this the way a business should work?
I know the answer is ALWAYS supposed to be "team work is always best," but I don't really get that.
What do you think? Is your company's model setup in teams of workers, or does everyone work independently? Do you like having a boss breathing down your neck to be sure you dot every i and cross every t?
I've worked both ways but always accomplish much bigger things when left alone to do them. I just wonder if I'm alone in that thought.
I remember not getting a job at Acxiom in Arkansas after not answering that question correctly. Their company model has (or had, it's been a lot of years) pods of people who work together doing the same job; work is assigned to the group and the group is held liable for the totality of the work. If there is a slacker on the team, the team is left to deal with the problem of the slacker.
It could be a substantial period of time before someone gets fired for not doing his/her part on the team...but in the meantime, the whole team suffers.
What do you think? Is this the way a business should work?




