So I've noticed on our last couple of trips that I've not seen any kids with lipstick on their cheeks or foreheads from getting kissed by the princesses or stepsisters etc. So are they no longer allowed to do so? On our very first trip my then 6 y/o DS got kissed by Snow White at epcot then on a MK day got kissed by both step sisters as they "fought" over him. Also my 11mo DS got kissed by Cinderella and my DD4 got kissed by Sleeping Beauty. Seems like if they're no longer allowed to do so its just a little more magic Disney has taken out of the experience. I know I'm being nostalgic but I remember our first day walking into DHS and they'r being characters all over the place as we walked in and it's still one of my favorite pics I have of my DD. It seems like now rather than characters being allowed to roam and be out and about you have to seek them out more.
I was there at the beginning of March and saw a kid with a huge lipstick mark on his head. Of course I don't know who actually put it there. I would bet it's just that the princesses do not kiss every single kid. they do it when the spirit moves them.
Characters don't roam anymore, it got too crazy with people trying to approach them.
Has anyone been kissed by a face character ever since the measles outbreak was traced to a citizen from a foreign country visiting Disneyland?
DL offered measles vaccinations free of charge to all CMs. I'm sure Disney also put mandatory safety precautions into place.
Kissing doesn't make a difference with measles transmission. If you're breathing the same air as someone who is contageous, you have a 90% chance of contracting it if you're unvaccinated. A kiss on the cheek won't change that.
Omigosh...he's adorable!!! She evidently thought so tooIn an effort to return this thread to an innocent discussion of whether princesses might be inclined to kiss a young boy who doesn't object (or whose parents don't object), I offer you a picture of my son getting kissed by and kissing Cinderella. No princesses or young boys were harmed in creating these pictures.
Aw, thanksI love your picture. He is adorable.
The measles vaccine was introduced in 1963 so if you were born in 1969, you would have received the vaccine as part of the routine childhood vaccines. Even if you didn't you would have been protected by herd immunity, which is now breaking down due to people not getting the vaccination. The majority of people who have contracted measles in the US have not had the immunization. In the CA cases alone 57 were unvaccinated and 20 had at least one mmr (but it doesn't say how many have the recommended 2 doses). The rest dont' have records. If you look at the number of reported cases, it goes up each year. In 2000 there were less than 10 in the US and now there are several hundred reported cases each year. So not much lighter than the norm.My son has never gotten such a kiss from a princess, and he met princesses from '06-'12 or so.
And thank goodness, as I would find it to be disgusting. No one needs to get random kisses. He sees pictures of kids with the big lipprints on them and thinks it's gross, too, thank goodness. I mean, he's 10 now so of course he feels that way, but even when little it wasn't something he wanted.
***********************
OH people are so irrational about it all.
"Measles is transmitted primarily from person to person by large respiratory droplets but can also spread by the airborne route as aerosolized droplet nuclei."
And while it's transmittable up to 4 days before the rash shows up, you are SICK before then. You have cold symptoms, with a fever, and just feeling like junk. People shouldn't be going to work or to themeparks when sick. If people would be rational about things when they are ill, there would be fewer problems.
Given that Merck has 3 separate whistleblowing, federal, lawsuits against them because of them lying about the efficacy, dropping results that they didn't like, etc, about the MMR vaccine, I would guess it's about a 70% of getting it (best case scenario) even if you DID get the shot. Remember that in most outbreaks, the majority of those getting it have had the shots. (and the ones that haven't don't *mind* getting it, especially measles, since it means natural lifelong immunity AND for women the ability to transfer 15-18 months of natural immunity to babies they subsequently have and nurse.)
And I bet it's not anywhere near 90% chance of getting it without the shots. I had the born-in-1969 shots, which is nowhere NEAR what the schedule is today, haven't had anything since at least '87, and I've never had it. DS hasn't had any shots and he's never had it. And we are out and about all the time, we were even at Disney and on planes and traveling around during the time of this semi-annual outbreak (as has ALWAYS happened, as will ALWAYS happen, and this year was actually much lighter in the normal and natural and always will happen semi-annual outbreak)...you'd think at some point we would have been exposed to it! I know of ONE person who has had it, and it wasn't officially diagnosed since they didn't mind getting it and knew how to take care of it on their own, so they didn't go to the doctor. In my circles, if it's 90%, you'd think I would know far more people who had had it if it was that easy to get.![]()