Angelina Jolie

Mizzoufan

DIS Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
8,764
I feel for her, It seem like she living in fear of what might happen.

Angelina Jolie has revealed that she had her ovaries and fallopian tubes removed preventively a week ago due to a family history of ovarian cancer and her having a gene mutation that puts her at high risk for the disease.

The 39-year-old film star and director had a preventive double mastectomy two years ago because the same mutation greatly increased her chances of getting breast cancer.

In an op ed in The New York Times on Tuesday Jolie, who is married to fellow movie star Bard Pitt and now goes by the name Angelina Jolie Pitt, recounted events of the last two weeks that led to her latest surgery.

She wrote that, when she told the world about her double mastectomy, "I wanted other women at risk to know about the options. I promised to follow up with any information that could be useful, including about my next preventive surgery, the removal of my ovaries and fallopian tubes."

Jolie said she had been planning that step "for some time," but recent blood tests added urgency to the situation. They pointed to possible increased levels of inflammation in her body that in turn could be indicators of cancer.



"I went through what I imagine thousands of other women have felt," Jolie wrote. "I told myself to stay calm, to be strong, and that I had no reason to think I wouldn't live to see my children grow up and to meet my grandchildren."

"I called my husband in France, who was on a plane within hours," she continued. "The beautiful thing about such moments in life is that there is so much clarity. You know what you live for and what matters. It is polarizing, and it is peaceful."

Jolie described an emotional meeting with the same surgeon who had operated on her mother, who would succumb to ovarian cancer.

The exam didn't show anything unusual, but Jolie had a PET/CT scan and tumor test looking for cancer anywhere in her body.

"If it was somewhere else in my body, I would know in five days. I passed those five days in a haze, attending my children's soccer game, and working to stay calm and focused," Jolie recalled.

The results were normal.

"There was still a chance of early stage cancer, but that was minor compared with a full-blown tumor," Jolie explained. "To my relief, I still had the option of removing my ovaries and fallopian tubes and I chose to do it."

"I did not do this solely because I carry the BRCA1 gene mutation, and I want other women to hear this," Jolie stressed. "A positive BRCA test does not mean a leap to surgery. I have spoken to many doctors, surgeons and naturopaths. There are other options. ...There is more than one way to deal with any health issue. The most important thing is to learn about the options and choose what is right for you personally."

She had the surgery last week and says she is already in menopause due to the absence of hormones the ovaries produce.

"It is not possible to remove all risk, and the fact is I remain prone to cancer," Jolie continued. "I will look for natural ways to strengthen my immune system. I feel feminine, and grounded in the choices I am making for myself and my family. I know my children will never have to say, 'Mom died of ovarian cancer.'

" ... I feel at ease with whatever will come, not because I am strong but because this is a part of life. It is nothing to be feared.

" ... It is not easy to make these decisions," Jolie concluded. "But it is possible to take control and tackle head-on any health issue. You can seek advice, learn about the options and make choices that are right for you. Knowledge is power."
 
Of course she lives in fear. After watching her mother slowly die of ovarian cancer, knowing that she also shares the gene responsible, why wouldnt she live in fear? I think under those circumstances i would have had my lady bits yanked a long time ago.
 
I don't have a family history of anything. I don't know how I'd behave if I did. From the outside, it seems like she spends a lot of energy worrying about cancer. I hope not. It must be terrible to live that way, if that's the case.
 
Of course she lives in fear. After watching her mother slowly die of ovarian cancer, knowing that she also shares the gene responsible, why wouldnt she live in fear? I think under those circumstances i would have had my lady bits yanked a long time ago.

You can't live your life in fear.
 

Her mother, grandmother and great-grandmother all died from cancer (I think all ovarian), and she has the gene that says she has up to a 40% chance of getting it, too (normal chance is only 1%). Removing the ovaries and fallopian tubes will hopefully allow her to spend less energy on worrying about it. I'm surprised it took her this long to do it.

I had the genetic testing done after I was diagnosed w/ breast cancer last year since I am high risk (two sisters and an aunt w/ bc, my age at diagnosis, etc). Had I come back positive, I would have had everything I needed yanked right out.
 
Her mother, grandmother and great-grandmother all died from cancer (I think all ovarian), and she has the gene that says she has up to a 40% chance of getting it, too (normal chance is only 1%). Removing the ovaries and fallopian tubes will hopefully allow her to spend less energy on worrying about it. I'm surprised it took her this long to do it.

I had the genetic testing done after I was diagnosed w/ breast cancer last year since I am high risk (two sisters and an aunt w/ bc, my age at diagnosis, etc). Had I come back positive, I would have had everything I needed yanked right out.
She didn't have ovarian cancer and nothing came back positive.
 
She didn't have ovarian cancer and nothing came back positive.

True. However, but every time her tests kept showing elevated CA125 markers, she'd have to go through all this testing, which is VERY stressful. If she was done having kids, then I say take it out. I knwo when a person has b/c and you test positive for that same gene, standard protocol is either ovarian suppression (shots or pills) or the surgery she had.
 
She receives the media attention because she makes sure everyone knows about it.
I don't think that is a bad thing in this case. She is using her fame to let women know that it is ok to have a mastectomy for preventative reasons. I know any women who contemplate the same thing when they find out they have the gene. It helped several of them to know that she is still considered a beautiful woman after the fact.

I don't see her living in fear, but making health decisions for the future that many face. A dear friend died of ovarian cancer. It is a devastating disease with vague symptoms. If I had the gene and was done having kids, you bet I would be at the surgeon having those ovaries removed. There are numerous women who gather courage when a famous person has it done.

She is not my favorite actress by all means, but I don't harbor any ill feelings that she is doing this and letting it be public.
 
I don't see what the big deal is about her having it done. If it just gives her one less thing to worry about, then good for her. She's 38 and made the choice out of free will. Whether or not she has ovaries or fallopian tubes, has absolutely no bearing on anyone else, and it's not like either or those things are necessary to prolong your life. So many people inject botox, fillers and have plastic surgery to try and look younger than they are, so why on earth should this woman be judged for having non-essential lady parts removed because she carries a gene that predicts an increased chance of a certain cancer. No different than taking cholesterol or high blood pressure drugs to prevent a heart attack, IMHO.
 
She asks for the publicity. She wants other people to know what is possible.
She reminds of some women who are pregnant for the first time. They think no one in the world has ever been pregnant before and they are somehow doing it better than everyone else. The majority of women are aware of how having their breasts/ovaries/uterus removes gets rid of the cancer or diminishes the risk for that particular cancer. The common folk that don't have access to the best doctors in the world or unlimited money still know the possibilities.
 
I have no issues with her. She has a high risk of developing two cancers and her family history strongly suggests it will happen to her. I would not want to wait until it presents itself, nor would I want to spend my life having annual cancer marker tests done and stressing out about every blip in the numbers (I already do that with thyroid cancer and it's not fun).

I don't think she's looking for attention but rather creating awareness among physicians and doctors that preventive treatment is okay.

Many non-famous people would probably like to have it done but aren't given the special treatment that Jolie's money and fame can get her with regard to medical treatment. The more she talks about it, the more this treatment will become acceptable (and paid for) for "common" folk.
 
I don't see it has her living in fear, I see it as doing what she can to prevent a very likely tragedy in her case.
I know I became more aware of things after I became a mother, she probably is thinking more about being here for all of her kid's futures. I applaud her decisions, if I knew there was a high chance of getting a particular cancer I would do what I could to prevent it instead of wait around and hope I don't get it, or hope I can beat it when I do. That isn't living in fear, its just living in reality IMO.
 
I have no issues with her. She has a high risk of developing two cancers and her family history strongly suggests it will happen to her. I would not want to wait until it presents itself, nor would I want to spend my life having annual cancer marker tests done and stressing out about every blip in the numbers (I already do that with thyroid cancer and it's not fun).

I don't think she's looking for attention but rather creating awareness among physicians and doctors that preventive treatment is okay.

Many non-famous people would probably like to have it done but aren't given the special treatment that Jolie's money and fame can get her with regard to medical treatment. The more she talks about it, the more this treatment will become acceptable (and paid for) for "common" folk.

I think this is it, exactly. I applaud her for using her celebrity status as a platform to create awareness of ovarian cancer and preventative treatment. She is making it "okay" to pursue that radical surgery. I'm sure that many women who have the BRCA-1 gene must agonize over what to do. Do I keep my ovaries so I can get pregnant later? Do I dare risk getting pregnant with a daughter, who one day may also agonize over this same question? How does voluntarily lopping off my breasts and ovaries affect me as a woman? Will I still feel feminine? Will my husband/SO still desire me after the surgery? What happens if he can't stand to look at me? (this actually happened to my younger cousin!)

None of us knows what we will eventually die of, but I'm sure Angelina (and Brad) can sleep better at night knowing that ovarian & breast cancers have been taken off the table entirely now.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom