its insane to me that anyone here thinks that the "No Swimming" sign isn't adequate to warn people to stay out of the water. Yes, swimming a different action than walking, true, but really?? You think that walking in the water is ok because you aren't physically in the act of swimming?? I rarely swim, don't care for it, not good at it, however when I go to a pool or the beach (an ocean beach not Disney "beaches") I walk in the water, often up to my shoulders. My feet are always touching the bottom and I am walking along trying to stay cool. I am not swimming. So by the people here's interpretation that the sign is not adequate enough to warn people, it would be ok for one to walk in the water even up to there armpits, because its "not swimming"?? Thats just ridiculous, if they don't want you swimming gin the water, they don't want anyone there period.
And this isn't to place blame on the family at all...My heart is breaking for this family, I can not even imagine the shear horror of going through this. Just pointing out the idiocy of the comments that the sign doesn't adequately warn people to stay out of the water.