Miss Jasmine
Time for something new!<BR><font color=limegreen><
- Joined
- May 23, 2001
- Messages
- 16,856
What kind of work are they doing for $27 an hour? Just curious. 


I don't think anyone who's telling the OP to "accept" the offer mean to stay there forever - just until they can find something else that they want to do and pays better (at least that's what I meant).EthansMom said:I don't know too many people who would be able to live off 35% of their current pay. And even if you could afford to take a 65% pay cut, why would you be willing to do so?
bicker said:That is not true.
Delphi Chairman and CEO Robert S. "Steve" Miller has agreed to work for $1 per year until the company emerges from bankruptcy, and a score of other top Delphi executives will take a 10 percent cut.
Let's keep things honest and accurate here, folks.
This was not part of the original plan. It only happened because of the outrage.
Yeah, but only if the US workers move to China to live. No family can live on $9.00/hr anywhere in the US. The entire situation stinks!WIcruizer said:Regardless of whether this is true or not, frankly it doesn't change your situation. Yes, it stinks... but whether they make $1,000,000 or $1 it doesn't justify workers getting paid 500% more than counterparts in China.
Yeah but how many of us are making $27 an hour? It's these ridiculous union wages that are causing some of the problems. If some raises had not been given in the past then maybe a 65% cut would not be needed now. Perhaps if the union negotiated some other sort of pay/benefit reduction PRIOR to bankruptcy it wouldn't be taking such a hit now. The fact of the matter is that many bankruptcies occur so that the union contracts can be broken. If the unions were proactive and reopened up collective bargaining PRIOR to the bankruptcy some of this could be avoided.Laugh O. Grams said:Yeah, but only if the US workers move to China to live. No family can live on $9.00/hr anywhere in the US. The entire situation stinks!
Miss Jasmine said:Yeah but how many of us are making $27 an hour? It's these ridiculous union wages that are causing some of the problems. If some raises had not been given in the past then maybe a 65% cut would not be needed now. Perhaps if the union negotiates some other sort of pay/benefit reduction PRIOR to bankruptcy it wouldn't be taking such a hit now. The fact of the matter is that many bankruptices occur so that the union contracts can be broken. If the unions were proactive and reopened up collective bargaining PRIOR to the bankruptcy some of this could be avoided.
To add:MrsNick said:JMHO, but I don't think the point is "how many of us are making $27 an hour." How would you feel if your boss said, we're cutting your wage by two-thirds, and someone said to you, well how many Chinese are making what you make an hour?
Cost of living in some places (especially the Northeast) makes $27 an hour a living wage, and not much more, while in other areas of America, someone might be very comfortable on that salary. That's why companies should not be comparing American wages to Chinese wages. You can't live on Chinese wages in an American economy.
If companies want to pay Chinese wages in America, then they should also only charge Chinese prices for their products when they do business in America.
Except, they want to have their cake and eat it, too. They want to pay low to Americans and sell high to Americans. And I think playing the Bankruptcy card is a dirty way to do extort people to accept any working condition.
Just my 2 cents.
Pre-tax that is over $56,000 a year. What is the median income of the US? I'm sorry but I have a difficult time believing that these positions are worth $27 an hour plus benefits. NO MATTER WHERE YOU LIVE.Laugh O. Grams said:To add:
$27.00 per hour X a 40 hour work week only equals a little over $1000/week, pre-tax. Noone's getting rich on those wages, believe me! I'd say that if you have a family with 2 kids and one stay at home parent, you're just about breaking even in a large majority of the US.
Myth alert! Computer Programming is not a "here to stay" job.It's really too bad, but take this as an opportunity to look into higher paying, "here to stay" jobs like med assistant, computer programming, and many others.
bicker said:Myth alert! Computer Programming is not a "here to stay" job.

There's a lot of that going around. We all want a financially-secure retirement. Yet most of us seek to assure that by investing -- relying on the profit of businesses to fund our old age. How can we expect a high rate of return while expecting businesses to pay high wages and charge low prices?Except, they want to have their cake and eat it, too.
I think this is taking things too personally. There is no "dirty" about it. It's a rational business decision, exercising responsible judgement as is required by the fiduciary obligations placed on corporate managers.And I think playing the Bankruptcy card is a dirty way to do extort people to accept any working condition.