FergieTCat
I am serious. And don't call me Shirley.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2000
- Messages
- 5,739
Thank you! Sometimes it just isn't worth the points.
You know what ... I am thoroughly sick of "vanity sizing" comments. It says: "Hey average-sized-12/14-woman ... DO YOU KNOW HOW FAT YOU REALLY ARE in "real" sizes from the 50's & 60's?" Who cares if a size "10" today would be a *gasp* 14 in the 50's? That was TWO generations ago. Let it go. Just listen to the CEO and you should be able to figure out why A&F stops at size 10 ... and it's not because a size 14 in the 50's is now a size 10.But a size 10 today is really not a true size 10, it's more like an old sized 14/16, and once you get into size 18, that was Women's Department. So I can understand them stopping at 10.
You know what ... I am thoroughly sick of "vanity sizing" comments. It says: "Hey average-sized-12/14-woman ... DO YOU KNOW HOW FAT YOU REALLY ARE in "real" sizes from the 50's & 60's?" Who cares if a size "10" today would be a *gasp* 14 in the 50's? That was TWO generations ago. Let it go. Just listen to the CEO and you should be able to figure out why A&F stops at size 10 ... and it's not because a size 14 in the 50's is now a size 10.
You know what ... I am thoroughly sick of "vanity sizing" comments. It says: "Hey average-sized-12/14-woman ... DO YOU KNOW HOW FAT YOU REALLY ARE in "real" sizes from the 50's & 60's?" Who cares if a size "10" today would be a *gasp* 14 in the 50's? That was TWO generations ago. Let it go. Just listen to the CEO and you should be able to figure out why A&F stops at size 10 ... and it's not because a size 14 in the 50's is now a size 10.
I don't care how cool my daughter is or wants to be but I will never, ever buy one stitch from A & F. I hope my child has the character to understand why when she reaches their target age.
The dumb CEO should have realized that offending the people with the money (parents) was a moronic thing to do.
Why is it "misleading"? What are you comparing today's sizes to that would make you say they are false? Sizes from 1950? 1960? 1970? They are what they are and it really doesn't matter what size the same measurements would be in the 1960's. And what is to say that today's sizing isn't the "real" sizing and the sizing from the 1950's was misleading large?Whether you are sick of it or not, it's something that has been going on for decades and it's misleading.
And I don't know about you or anyone else, but it confuses me that as I've gained weight over the years, my clothing size keeps getting smaller.What size am I really?
Sometimes they do. Although their sizing is generally measurements (pants is waist size and inseam length & dress shirts are collar and sleeve length) they still have fit variations like "European Cut" or "straight", "relaxed" or "skinny". I would bet that a grown man that would fit in a 32x32 "relaxed" cut pants may not fit in a 32x32 "skinny" cut pants because their butt or thighs may be bigger than the high school boy the jeans are marketed to. A European Cut shirt won't fit a man with a belly even through the neck and cuffs fit properly.Men don't have this problem.
He looks slightly like Gary Busey and sounds almost as crazy.
ITA. My oldest could not fit in their clothes. She is 5'11" with birl girl curves. She couldn't fit in some other stores too and that's the way it goes sometimes. But for them to say the reason is about their image and being "cool" is just sad. She hated not being able to shop like her friends.
My younger DD does fit their target size and is tiny. But I hate that she is so proud of being "skinny" because that is so favored. She is too thin and all these messages that thin is best aren't helping. We try to emphasize being healthy, not super thin.
DS is normal size, would fit their clothes, but is not part of the "cool" crowd - his words. He is part of a close group of goofy gamer friends. How do they prevent the funny nerds from ruining their image?
Kids have to endure so many body image issues already, it's a shame that a retailer is knowingly contributing to those issues.
Why is it "misleading"? What are you comparing today's sizes to that would make you say they are false? Sizes from 1950? 1960? 1970? They are what they are and it really doesn't matter what size the same measurements would be in the 1960's. And what is to say that today's sizing isn't the "real" sizing and the sizing from the 1950's was misleading large?
Sometimes they do. Although their sizing is generally measurements (pants is waist size and inseam length & dress shirts are collar and sleeve length) they still have fit variations like "European Cut" or "straight", "relaxed" or "skinny". I would bet that a grown man that would fit in a 32x32 "relaxed" cut pants may not fit in a 32x32 "skinny" cut pants because their butt or thighs may be bigger than the high school boy the jeans are marketed to. A European Cut shirt won't fit a man with a belly even through the neck and cuffs fit properly.
And then there's this:
http://jezebel.com/5289492/abercrombie-banishes-girl-with-prosthetic-arm-to-storeroom-because-she-doesnt-fit-the-look-policy
Abercrombie "Banishes" Girl With Prosthetic Arm To Storeroom Because She Doesn't Fit The "Look Policy"
Are you sure that your daughter is "too thin" or is this your standard of weight? I think we blame the wrong people for our weight issues. It's almost always friends and family commenting on the kids weight ("too heavy" or "too thin"). I don't think that the free market is as influential as people think. In other words, society sets the tone.
Many people are naturally thin or just eat to live not live to eat.
And I don't know about you or anyone else, but it confuses me that as I've gained weight over the years, my clothing size keeps getting smaller.What size am I really?
Men don't have this problem.
My younger DD does fit their target size and is tiny. But I hate that she is so proud of being "skinny" because that is so favored. She is too thin and all these messages that thin is best aren't helping. We try to emphasize being healthy, not super thin.
Are you sure that your daughter is "too thin" or is this your standard of weight? I think we blame the wrong people for our weight issues. It's almost always friends and family commenting on the kids weight ("too heavy" or "too thin"). I don't think that the free market is as influential as people think. In other words, society sets the tone.
Many people are naturally thin or just eat to live not live to eat.
Are you sure that your daughter is "too thin" or is this your standard of weight? I think we blame the wrong people for our weight issues. It's almost always friends and family commenting on the kids weight ("too heavy" or "too thin"). I don't think that the free market is as influential as people think. In other words, society sets the tone.
Many people are naturally thin or just eat to live not live to eat.
My DD is that way too and it has opened my eyes to just how messed up our culture is in terms of body image. She's very thin, right at the border between underweight and normal on the BMI scale, and being that small there aren't many brands she can't wear (there are some... because they don't make 00s or 0s and 1s are too big). But you know what? Even being naturally tiny isn't "good enough" - she worries about her weight, has talked about dieting, etc. just like every other girl her age. Her first response to developing hips and breasts wasn't "I'm growing up" - it was "I'm getting fat".
Friends and family comment directly, but the image of beauty that we internalize comes from a much broader base. Look at what is held out as beautiful to our girls, even from a young age. You don't have to look far... Heck, Disney even gave Merida - the first princess with a realistic rather than idealized body type - a makeover before officially crowning her a princess. Now she's got a Barbie-tiny waist and Marilyn Monroe curves rather than being the girl-next-door tomboy that her character was in the movie. We got in the car one morning to a couple of DJs talking about how fat Jennifer Lawrence looked in her gown at some awards show. Girls do internalize all of these things, even moreso sometimes than the opinions of family and friends (which are easy to write off as "Of course you think I'm pretty, you're my mom/dad/grandparent/best friend").
And I think the "eat to live, not live to eat" theme is way off the mark. I think a big part of the problem with American diets is that we do "eat to live"... in the sense that preparing and consuming food are given all the time and attention of an unpleasant chore. We aren't fat because we "live to eat" and enjoy fine culinary experiences; we're fat because "eating to live" has come to mean wolfing down prepared, convenience, or fast foods in between more important or more enjoyable tasks.
Saw a video online today of a guy passing out A & F clothes to a bunch of homeless guys on the street.
Awww, that's nice of him. Especially considering how expensive it is.