crvetter
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2018
- Messages
- 3,392
True but more specifically I'm referring to VGF which has sold 275 fixed weeks or 4% of their total points. So in your example you are talking about $1.18 million in Management Fees for the Resort. Using the exact same numbers they would be out $165,000 in rental income (5,500 points) which also eats through about half of the ~12,000 points that DVD owns at VGF (though this number could be higher or lower we don't know the exact details on the contract); this is also slightly over 10% of the management fees they collect. You looked at the numbers in aggregate across all resorts. I'm sure when the higher ups see these numbers they will be looking at a resort by resort basis (or only those resorts with GWs). They wouldn't allow those older than Aulani (first resort with GW) to absorb the cost because it skews the problem.Interesting, but it still seems de minimis in the scheme of the DVC operation.
Looking at the two most recent resorts, Riviera has sold 29 fixed week deeds so far and CCV sold 27 (just 0.15% of its points). If the average fixed week contract was 200 points and Disney was 'out of the money' by a full 10% on each of them, they'd have to contribute ~1,100 points. Even though DVC rents their points for a pretty penny (often $30+) that's still only like $35k in value lost.
A rounding error compared to the $30+ million in management fees DVCMC collects each year from the dues.
Overall looking at VGF under your assumption doesn't look well on the resort level and I'm sure if it consistently left a 10% drag on their bottom line (and potentially could lead to a depletion of their points especially here when the popular DVC time is where the GWs were all bought for the most part). So this could limit their desire to adjust the first 2 weeks of December and for consistency across all resorts at WDW (because then their cash rates would seem wonky) they likely wouldn't adjust the first 2 weeks of December at any resort too much. Actually cash rates are a huge issue for adjusting point requirements too. If they increase those weeks in points implies cash rates must go up. Therefore it makes DVD hard pressed to rent their points at those resorts during those times because the cash cost at a DVC resort would be higher than the Deluxe Resorts. The opposite happens with summer cant go to cheap point wise or their cash prices would be out of line of rental prices (so they need to lower the cash price) but then it would be too far out of line of the Deluxe Resorts. They desire the point charts to be in line with the cash business for these reason probably. Similar reasons exist why they would never want the Bungalows or Cabins to be too cheap (and like many of us asserted anyway they can't correct) it would diminish the value of other suites on property (think presidential rooms, etc).
Last edited: