I don't know, I have a bit of a different take on it.
CM Punk is one of the most talented technical wrestlers they have (not saying the only one just one of them). I mean, I love John Cena and his persona but he isn't the best wrestler. CM Punk is as good as Randy Savage was and that's saying a lot. Plus he is the best "talker" they have. Add to that he is one of the few (Daniel Bryan being another one) that gets a reaction from the whole crowd. Even as a heel, he was loved by the crowd. And gets over even bigger as a face.
He was mad about Batista and I see his point. The crowd wasn't happy about it either. Daniel Bryan deserves the main event. Actually so does CM Punk. The past two years they pulled in Rock. First year was fine, but the second year was a flop, imo. And now they have pulled in Batista.
TMZ says its because of his own desire for a title shot, other reports from folks in the wrestling business says its because he thinks Daniel deserved a shot. Don't know which one is true, maybe its both. But I know that he has stood up for other wrestlers before when he thought they were being treated badly. This isn't the first time he has stated his unhappiness with the way WWE is being run.
Punk and Cena have been doing both RAW and Smackdown. Its obvious that Vince (or Triple H) saw some reason to pull them over to Smackdown do make a bigger draw there. He used Punk for that but doesn't seem to see the value in this man.
CM Punk should be on top. Right there with Cena and Daniel. But instead they push Batista. Who may or may not be around awhile. Or they push Brock Lesnar who isn't going to be around long because he can't. He has health issues that causes him to have to be out and makes him too easy to get hurt. And besides has said that he has no interest in being full time. Or they push Rock who isn't going to stay either. Giving the Rock the belt, was imo, bad writing. Who thought he was going to stay for any length of time? I mean really, did anyone not think he was going to lose the belt to Cena?
I think Punk has a point about the part time guys. And lets don't forget the come back of RVD-a huge flop. These guys come in and get main events at the PPV (which give big paychecks) but aren't in the trenches working matches in the weekly shows, the live shows, and all the other appearances. I mean they do show up at RAW, but not the many other shows that the regular guys are contracted to do and many times they show up just to talk, do a run in or something like that. RVD actually did have matches, just didn't get over well after his initial return.
I think what they are going to find is that Punk doesn't need them. He hasn't gone nuts spending money and needing his contract. Do they need him? I don't know.
I like watching Punk. I enjoy every match he is in and hate to see him go. And if he started in MMA (another rumor/possibility), I may just have to watch. But, I realize that WWE will live on without him.
I have to agree with him about one thing, the writing has not been up to par week after week. We see too many of the same matches again and again and again. I have no idea who is really in charge, some say Vince, some say it is Triple H. Whichever it is, the other one needs to step in and get a new creative team.
Its funny. I would have thought that the WWE would be so much different than the indy promotions that DS has been a part of. Its not. The guys get frustrated with the writing, the way the matches are booked, the pay, getting or not getting the pushes, who is in or not in the main event. They just get to argue about bigger pay.