TipsyTraveler
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2014
- Messages
- 4,699
lockedoutlogic, do we know what percentage of visitors are once-in-a-lifetime vs. repeat travelers? Because as much as I'm sure they'd like to make their business plan all about "increase the Y" I just don't know if that's feasible long term.
I went to WDW three times as a kid. That would've been the end of my Disney days except then they opened DAK and AKL and I wanted to see them. So that drew me back as an adult. After only two adult trips I'm already feeling a sense of been-there-done-that, and I'm starting to branch out to get my Disney fix from places that have something new to offer me. I did Tokyo this year. Thinking about my next Disney trip, I get stuck. Paris is in sad shape. Hong Kong doesn't have much to offer. Shanghai will be new and exciting, but it'll still be just one park and that seems like a long way to go for something that will only fill two parks days. Anaheim? Maybe, but I've been there once before, too. So I think about going back to WDW, I price it out, and I just can't justify spending that kind of money on something I've already experienced multiple times.
It seems to me like they're going to HAVE to build/upgrade/expand at some point if they want to keep bringing people in, regardless if those people are the X% or the Y%. Even with DVC members who are more or less locked in, I imagine their vacation habits will change if Disney doesn't offer them something new. They'll start treating their vacations like a relax by the pool resort. Why spend money for park tickets when they've done every ride a hundred times and there's nothing new to see? Why go to overpriced restaurants for mediocre food when they can eat in the room? Why buy souvenirs from a place they've gone to every year for the past twenty years? And this is how Disney loses money. (DVC may end up being Disney's kiss of death.)
I guess my long-winded point is that Disney is going to have to invest in giving us new things if they want people to A) come, or B) spend like they used to. Unless they can keep floating by solely on once-in-a-lifetime visitors (new ones are being made every day) to whom everything is new and exciting. Although, even there it seems like the "increase the Y" strategy can't work forever. Are the Y income folks of 2030 really going to drop loads of money to go to experience cutting edge 1990's technology? If Disney lets its reputation of "a childhood wonderland where memories are made" shift to "old-timey, stale parks your grandparents like for the nostalgia", they're sunk.
I don't know, the more I think about it the more I think they're going to have to "build" their way into the future vs. solely attempting to increase the Y.
Sorry if I'm going too off topic for this thread. Let me bring it back: Hollywood Studios... Yeah, it needs stuff.
I went to WDW three times as a kid. That would've been the end of my Disney days except then they opened DAK and AKL and I wanted to see them. So that drew me back as an adult. After only two adult trips I'm already feeling a sense of been-there-done-that, and I'm starting to branch out to get my Disney fix from places that have something new to offer me. I did Tokyo this year. Thinking about my next Disney trip, I get stuck. Paris is in sad shape. Hong Kong doesn't have much to offer. Shanghai will be new and exciting, but it'll still be just one park and that seems like a long way to go for something that will only fill two parks days. Anaheim? Maybe, but I've been there once before, too. So I think about going back to WDW, I price it out, and I just can't justify spending that kind of money on something I've already experienced multiple times.
It seems to me like they're going to HAVE to build/upgrade/expand at some point if they want to keep bringing people in, regardless if those people are the X% or the Y%. Even with DVC members who are more or less locked in, I imagine their vacation habits will change if Disney doesn't offer them something new. They'll start treating their vacations like a relax by the pool resort. Why spend money for park tickets when they've done every ride a hundred times and there's nothing new to see? Why go to overpriced restaurants for mediocre food when they can eat in the room? Why buy souvenirs from a place they've gone to every year for the past twenty years? And this is how Disney loses money. (DVC may end up being Disney's kiss of death.)
I guess my long-winded point is that Disney is going to have to invest in giving us new things if they want people to A) come, or B) spend like they used to. Unless they can keep floating by solely on once-in-a-lifetime visitors (new ones are being made every day) to whom everything is new and exciting. Although, even there it seems like the "increase the Y" strategy can't work forever. Are the Y income folks of 2030 really going to drop loads of money to go to experience cutting edge 1990's technology? If Disney lets its reputation of "a childhood wonderland where memories are made" shift to "old-timey, stale parks your grandparents like for the nostalgia", they're sunk.
I don't know, the more I think about it the more I think they're going to have to "build" their way into the future vs. solely attempting to increase the Y.
Sorry if I'm going too off topic for this thread. Let me bring it back: Hollywood Studios... Yeah, it needs stuff.
