![]()
Precisely!
Wow! I must be a selfish cow! Years ago when my boys were very young then yes, maybe twice over the years I brought their lunch in to the school (it was allowed) but that hasn't happened since they were 7 or 8 or so. At that age I still felt it was my job to make sure they had their lunch with them so yes I'd drop it off (as I say rarely). I would apologise profusely to the school secretary and I would insist that she pass the lunch on in her time when it was convenient.
If my 17 or 14 year old forgot their lunch now, not only would they go hungry, they'd get a telling off from me and their Dad. I'm a demon. lol! It has taken quite a bit of work to 'train' my 14 year old to remember all his stuff. He can be very unfocused and when he started secondary school he regularly forgot books, pens, folders, etc. But the work has paid off. He doesn't forget things anymore. If I made a habit of dropping things off at his school, oh my God, he'd forget 10 things a day.
I can't begin to imagine the chaos of allowing parents unlimited access to their kids during the day. You do realise you'd have parents of snowflakes coming in for a chat, for a hug, to bring a little treat, to check their kid's work etc. Those parents exist. Teachers have it hard enough without those constant interruptions. It's important for the welfare of all the kids that schools minimize interruptions.
Okay, you've said yourself you were one of the parents that did it in elementary school. Can't the majority of us agree there's a place between "no parent is ever allowed to rescue..." and "parents can always..." ? I'm in total agreement that constant interuptions are bad. However, I taught for quite a few years and don't remember ever having an issue with these kinds of interuptions. Maybe 2 or 3 times a year total. I never felt the need to say never - it wasn't an issue - and, if it's important enough to the student, I'd rather have a drop in rescue than an extremely stressed out student.