tinkerhon
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 1, 2012
- Messages
- 5,865
That's how I feel. I wish there was a way for them to only give it to those in need due to all of this. I'm a school counselor (so far still getting paid) and DH is in the military so fortunately financially not much has changed for us in terms of immediate issues. We don't need it and I feel so frustrated for those that are literally being destroyed by this. I'm really hoping they find a way to help those in need without being wasteful.
Cap I read is under $90,000 (single) or $175,000 household - if under that, each adult AND child receives a check - also read a $75,000 cap (single)
I think that’s the idea. Wether you need it or not is irrelevant. Mine will go to something travel related.I will spend it to help with the economy. Not sure where.
Yes and people with higher incomes get laid off too.I hate caps. They *never* take into account the people in high CoL areas that, while appear to make a lot of money on paper, have such high expenses. My DD just went over that cap a few months ago. Her rent in the city is $1800 per month. There are people who earn above caps that have expenses and also don't get paid during something like this.
Reading now that the proposed amount would probably be $2,000 ( or more) for every American adult and child, mailed ( or direct deposit) sent by April 1, with another $1,500 check in the summer, and another $1,000 check in the fall -
Maybe there hoping the people that don’t need it for necessities will spend it to help avoid mass layoffs. Put the money back in the economy. No it’s not going to help the unemployed, but we do have unemployment assistance.My original comment still stands. If the government thinks it is bad enough to warrant three checks into the fall, we are all in for a world of HUGE hurt. I know they are still working out details. It is still a drop in the bucket if people have no income for several months and have bills like mortgages, cars, food, utilities. Granted better than nothing, but even this money is going to eventually have to come from somewhere.
My original comment still stands. If the government thinks it is bad enough to warrant three checks into the fall, we are all in for a world of HUGE hurt. I know they are still working out details. It is still a drop in the bucket if people have no income for several months and have bills like mortgages, cars, food, utilities. Granted better than nothing, but even this money is going to eventually have to come from somewhere.
They're talking about every American adult -- that'd include retirees.This isn't for us old retirees is it?
Good point. I also heard a suggestion on the news that if you're concerned about local places /don't feel free to go out, buy a gift card. It'll help them "keep going".Whatever you do, spend it in the US economy. It's going to need it ...
True. Everything that the government gives you was taken from someone. Sometimes it's taken from Future You.Money is never free ...
My prediction is unemployment will hit 60% in the next 4 months.I find this ridiculous. It would cost MUCH less to go with having employers pay sick leave and/or severance to the folks impacted, and then pay the companies back.
Even the cost of cutting the darned checks is going to cost a fortune (and I will bet ANYTHING) that just like the last time the Feds decided to send everyone a check, first they will spend quite a few million on sending everyone a letter to warn them to expect the letter with the check.) As to where it is going to come from, why, from us. This was done once before in 2009, and we ended up having to pay it back when income taxes came due the following year.
There's a reason why it is being done this way even though it will cost an obscene amount of money just to process, but we can't discuss it.