robinb
DIS veteran
- Joined
- Aug 29, 1999
- Messages
- 44,720
weregoingtodw said:Actually, I think *you* are still missing the point, at least the point that I made. My point is that two wrongs don't make a right. Certainly, you'd think someone would have the presence of mind to be more careful after accidentally bumping someone else. Obviously this individual, for whatever reason, didn't avoid that the second time either.
However, since:
Are you really surprised that people are calling you out for your behavior? I'm sure I'd have been pretty irritated if someone hit my legs as well; I just don't agree that a dirty look - especially for a first offense! - and most definitely, a personal confrontation, was necessarily the best reaction.
Okay... you're right, but since you already admitted to giving her a dirty look, I'm assuming that you didn't have a courteous, "Could you please give me a little more space?" tone in your voice.
In all fairness, what makes you think that she'd be inclined to "nicely apologize to you" after the second hit, especially after you gave her a dirty look peviously?
Still just my opinion, but I think I'd tend to get out of the way of the aggressive stroller drivers - as well as the "back off" yellers and dirty look throwers - rather than engage in a personal confrontation.
To each their own!
ducklite said:Stroller pushers who don't apologize after hitting someone should be glad that they don't get a lot worse than being told to back off. Where I live assault is punishable with legal action.
Accidents do happen, but if someone is doing it repeatedly and purposely to keep someone from getting in front of them or to get through the crowds quicker, then that's just pathetic, careless, and stupid.
ducklite said:An assault is:
(a) An unlawful attempt, coupled with apparent ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another; or
(b) An intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence
is imminent.
Because she didn't apologize after the first hit, the second seemed quite intentional. Therefore assault is quite applicable.
I stand by the fact that there are written posted policies, and anyone who ignores them either doesn't have the mental capacity to understand them, or is simply inconsiderant at best and ignorant at worst.
Anne
rt2dz said:Last night my cousin was driving his motercycle down the freeway, 100% legally. Someone switched lanes while he was in it. Dragged with 78 miles without stopping. People were chasing the driver down and he was trying to get my cousin (who never even lost conscienceness) off his car and get away. My cousin had his right leg amputated. May loose his left leg and possibly his right arm. THAT is assualt.
shafke said:Maybe they should just put cow catchers on the front of the stroller. That when plowing through the crowds people will just get bumped off to the side![]()
rt2dz said:You are correct. Unless, the person did an unsafe lane change/cut you off in traffic, ran a stop sign/stoplight, had rear lights off/not working, or slammed on their brakes without a reason. The same reason *most* stroller pushers hit other walkers. And then, do you get out of your car and start screaming at the other driver like some kind of mad dog or do you just calmly check to make sure everyone is OK, exchange insuriance info, and get on with life?
I believe most stroller pushers do the best they can, despite what some people may think. Accidents happen. And when someone is sorry and apologizes, does screaming help? When does being rude to anyone ever help in any situation?
Jan said:with the exception of the motorcycle "accident" that is. that is nothing but sad.
i am in love with this thread. this is a ton more entertaining than: "will the dining plan allow a dole whip for a snack"
granted, i think some of you are nuts - especially d-lite. wow! you have a low threshhold for charging crimes. that is what i do for a living (prosecutor) and i hope i never charge a case that lame. maybe i could slap an "inattentive driving" on the negligent stroller driver. of course, you are not claiming negligence - you think there is a rogue stroller gang out there intent on attacking your ankles. you are either a civil attorney or one of those people who learned law on the internet so they could fight their traffic tickets.
my favorite has been the photos/graphics. i about peed my pants. wish i was computer savvy enough to do that!!
thank you all for the entertainment. some of you i would love to "run into" figuratively at disney, and some of you i would love to "run into" literally.
rt2dz said:The Key words here are "Unlawful attempt", "intentional", "violence"
A stroller bump isn't violence even if it does possibly cause harm. And I can say with almost total certainty that even if that person is rude and careless, I'm sure it wasn't intentional.
And I whole heartly agree that anyone who can't understand things might not have mental capacity and is simply inconsiderate at best and probably ignorant.
Do you really want to know what assault is? Last night my cousin was driving his motercycle down the freeway, 100% legally. Someone switched lanes while he was in it. Dragged with 78 miles without stopping. People were chasing the driver down and he was trying to get my cousin (who never even lost conscienceness) off his car and get away. My cousin had his right leg amputated. May loose his left leg and possibly his right arm. THAT is assualt. THAT is violence. THAT was intentional. And, no the other driver wasn't even drunk. I say get over the stroller bump, past and future. And be thankful you get to work again, won't loose your house, aren't forced to spend the next 1-2 years in a hospital, and have life end in every other way you know it.