I'm trying not to get too upset about this, but the more I think about it, the madder I get.
My sister is pregnant and due 3 days before I am. She works at a hospital. Apparently a few weeks ago, she treated a patient and then found out that the baby had Parvo (Fifth Disease). The doctor was supposed to write on the baby's chart that s/he might have Parvo, since it's very bad for pregnant women to be exposed to it, but he didn't. When my sister found out about it, the hospital made a big thing about it. Exposure to Parvo while you're pregnant is a big deal. It can make the baby need to have a transfusion while it's still in the womb.
So after her shift was over, my sister went to her doctor and had titres drawn (blood test) to see if she's immune to Parvo. If she's already immune, it's no big deal because she wouldn't be able to "catch" it and pass it onto the baby.
The results of the blood test take a few days. The day she had her blood drawn, my dad came into town on business. My parents live in San Antonio. Obviously, he wanted to see both my sister and me. My sister wanted to spend all the time with him that she could, rather than having him spend some time with just me and some time with just her, so she chose not to tell me that she had been exposed to Parvo and might be carrying a disease that could really hurt both of our babies.
Since then, she found out she was immune to it, so it's not a big deal. She didn't tell me about the whole thing until yesterday, and she just laughed about it, saying she knew that I would have "freaked out" and not wanted to go around her if I knew she might be carrying this disease. She's completely right. I wouldn't have gone around her until I knew that she wasn't carrying Parvo, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. It should have been my decision, but I didn't get to make it.
In the end, it turns out that both of our babies should be fine, so that's what's important. However, I don't like knowing that she apparently thought it was okay to jeopardize my baby's well-being just to spend an extra few hours with my dad. That's the part that makes me mad. In fact, I don't really believe that it was entirely because she missed our dad that much. I don't want to even think about why she could want to do that to my baby.
So am I overreacting? I haven't said anything yet, and I am reminding myself over and over that in the end, it all worked out fine. There's nothing wrong with either of our babies. But I would have liked to have been informed so that I could have been a part of the decision-making process. I don't want my sister making health decisions for my child, especially ones that are irresponsible.
My sister is pregnant and due 3 days before I am. She works at a hospital. Apparently a few weeks ago, she treated a patient and then found out that the baby had Parvo (Fifth Disease). The doctor was supposed to write on the baby's chart that s/he might have Parvo, since it's very bad for pregnant women to be exposed to it, but he didn't. When my sister found out about it, the hospital made a big thing about it. Exposure to Parvo while you're pregnant is a big deal. It can make the baby need to have a transfusion while it's still in the womb.
So after her shift was over, my sister went to her doctor and had titres drawn (blood test) to see if she's immune to Parvo. If she's already immune, it's no big deal because she wouldn't be able to "catch" it and pass it onto the baby.
The results of the blood test take a few days. The day she had her blood drawn, my dad came into town on business. My parents live in San Antonio. Obviously, he wanted to see both my sister and me. My sister wanted to spend all the time with him that she could, rather than having him spend some time with just me and some time with just her, so she chose not to tell me that she had been exposed to Parvo and might be carrying a disease that could really hurt both of our babies.
Since then, she found out she was immune to it, so it's not a big deal. She didn't tell me about the whole thing until yesterday, and she just laughed about it, saying she knew that I would have "freaked out" and not wanted to go around her if I knew she might be carrying this disease. She's completely right. I wouldn't have gone around her until I knew that she wasn't carrying Parvo, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. It should have been my decision, but I didn't get to make it.
In the end, it turns out that both of our babies should be fine, so that's what's important. However, I don't like knowing that she apparently thought it was okay to jeopardize my baby's well-being just to spend an extra few hours with my dad. That's the part that makes me mad. In fact, I don't really believe that it was entirely because she missed our dad that much. I don't want to even think about why she could want to do that to my baby.
So am I overreacting? I haven't said anything yet, and I am reminding myself over and over that in the end, it all worked out fine. There's nothing wrong with either of our babies. But I would have liked to have been informed so that I could have been a part of the decision-making process. I don't want my sister making health decisions for my child, especially ones that are irresponsible.