Does the media, in general, have a political agenda? Yes.
Does the media, in general, manipulate information to further their agenda? Yes.
Does the media, in general, misrepresent information to further their agenda? Yes.
Does the media, in general, ignore and/or neglect to disseminate information that would hinder their agenda? Yes.
Is this story an example of this? Absolutely!
This story is a perfect example of why there should NOT be hate crime legislation. As another poster said, aren't all murders of this nature HATEFUL? Why do we, as a society, feel the need to state the obvious? Why the need for additional punishment if the HATE stems from a specific POLITICALLY ACTIVE group of people?
Doesn't this create a division between the victims who are a part of these now "protected class" and those who are not? Can this really bring us together as people or further pull us apart?
Does the Hate Crime conviction help to heal the black or gay victims families any more than the murder conviction? If not, why have it? If so, why not offer this same helpful healing to the white victims families?
The media hyped up the Byrd and Sheppard murders and promoted Hate Crime legislation. To give this current case air time would expose the Hate Crime legislation to debate. It would expose it as the knee-jerk, media-manipulated junk it is. (IMO)
Not only would this expose the media itself to criticism for the manner in which they do business, but it would hurt the media's political agenda -- which, unfortunately, seems to be more important than the truth.
JMO...