Originally posted by thelobstershanty
If you are speaking of the Outback chain restaurant near WDW, I just have to point out that nothing could be farther from the truth.
I did mean the Outback chain, and, of course, that's in your (humble) opinion

. To be honest, I long ago realized that I'm just not one of those folks who feels that there's value in the most expensive of meals. For example: Outback's Victoria Filet (9oz): $18.99 - Shula's Filet(12oz): $38.95. I've had both, and I just can't taste whatever others taste that justifies it costing more than twice as much for 3 oz more. Recently had dinner in Las Vegas with epicurian friends (American Bar and Grill, Rio) and the menu offered two kinds of steaks - Black Angus, and something called "Dry Aged" (news to me, my friend had heard of it) - "Dry Aged" cost $10-15 more for the same size of the same cut. We paid the premium, and while my friend waxed poetically that this was the best steak he'd ever had, to me it didn't taste that much better than Outback (or Lone Star, or Logan's Roadhouse, etc....) [Note: Had KOBE beef on that trip, too - also highly over-rated]. So when the entrees start hitting the heights of $30, $40, $50 and up, I head the other way.
Bringing this back on topic a bit, my feelings are the same - but even stronger - when it comes to WDW restaurants. With very few exceptions (for example, 'Ohana, which offers a fairly unique - and, IMHO, quite fun - dining experience, and Le Cellier - mmmm, cheese soup), I find Disney overpriced for what is offered. I feel that, by going off-site, I can find a meal that's just as satisfying for less money - and given resort.to.resort transportation, I might even get back to our room quicker afterwards.
IMHO - YMMV