What's the deal with peanut allergies?

I was not making the case that breastfeeding did not have significant benefits, only that I do not think breastfeeding is lowering the rates of food allergies.

I agree with you, and I'm not sure breastfeeding has anything at all to to do with increasing asthma rates--I think those are 85% environmental (including a smoking parent in the home), 10% hereditary, and 5% who knows.

Anne
 
I consumed peanut butter like crazy when I was pregnant with DS#1, and he has a peanut allergy. I avoided peanuts/peanut butter/ nuts/ legumes like the plague when I was pregnant with and breast feeding DS#2, and he has a peanut allergy. I breast fed both kids for 2 1/2 years and 2 years respectively, and my mom breastfed me. My house is tidy, but I don't sanitize or clean obsessively and never have, and I used to avoid using anti-bacterial products.

My allergist says that allergies are on the rise in all age groups. Teenagers are showing up at her office who have never had allergies before, but have develped them across the board. They are having trouble finding foods they can eat. Cells showing signs of allergic reactions are showing up in the body in places they haven't ever been seen before. She thinks it has something to do with what we're putting in our foods, the additives, the processing, the pesticides, whatever China decides to add to stuff they send to the U.S. Some countries have also linked the increase in allergies to immunizations. Genetics of course play a part.

More research needs to be done and more money needs to be devoted to research, but sadly, pharmaceutical companies don't see food allergy treatments as potential big money makers. Maybe if the allergies become even more prevalent, there will be more of an effort to find a cure.

I agree with your allergist. I have known about the rise in allergies for many years. My mother was told the same thing 20 years ago that your allergist told you. She was diagnosed with a very rare form of Lupus known as hypocomplementaemic urticarial vasculitis (now shortened to HUVS). When she was dianosed with it, there were only 7 known cases un the US & Canada. That number has since gone up.

I think a hell of a lot more people have breast fed in the past 30 years than did from 1955-75.

Soy allergies are definitely on the rise -- my sister is a school cafeteria manager and soy allergies are second only to peanut allergies. Soy is in EVERYTHING now -- it's the next high-fructose corn syrup in terms of being put into every conceivable foodstuff.

As for asthma and other respiratory "allergies" -- it's sick building syndrome. Old fashioned buildings breathed -- now windows are sealed so tightly (and in most offices and schools don't open, PERIOD) that kids in school and adults at work are trapped in constantly recirculating air. How often do we really think those air ducts are cleaned? Ever?

Even the new windows people have in their homes, so good for fuel savings and keeping outside noise at a minimum contribute in the wintertime to respiratory problems.

Yep. Once upon a time (only 100 years ago) we spent much of our time outdoors. When not outdoors, we were inside buildings that did breathe.
As for the recirculating air, think about this. Very few plants inside these buildings to change what everyone is breathing out into oxygen. We are breathing each other's air inside these buildings. Not to mention what ever dust, mold and anything else that's stuck inside these air ducts.


Lots of diseases have been on the rise in the last 25+ years; allergies, Alzheimer’s, MS, lupus and other autoimmune diseases, autism, childhood behavioral disorders, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome just to name a few are happening at staggering rates. Everybody wonders why so many kids have autism and why so many old people are getting neurological disorders. Why are so many women getting autoimmune disease? Well, something else emerged in the early 80s besides an increase in diseases; aspartame. Many Americans (and I was once on of them) consume diet sodas by the bucket-loads. I know that a lot of people will think I’m a whack-job, but I really believe aspartame is behind a lot of the illnesses in the USA today. And yes, I do realize that the scientific “evidence” doesn’t back this up. But I also know that many, if not most doctors feel that aspartame at best “causes problems for some people” and at worst is “a national health crisis.” There is tons of anecdotal evidence; evidence that most doctors I’ve seen believe points to aspartame as being a cause for the increase in certain health problems. But the government studies show otherwise. Some people argue this is because aspartame is a huge business in the USA. I hate conspiracy theories myself, but I have to question those studies because I know my own personal experience leaves me with no doubt whatsoever that aspartame made me very sick.

Just something to think about! People are looking for causes for today’s increase in certain health issues. It could be a big coincidence, but aspartame came out in the very early 80s, and that is also when all these allergies, behavior problems, neurological and autoimmune disorders began to increase. As for peanut allergies, there could be lots of reasons for it. But aspartame usage could be a factor.

My mother contracted her form of Lupus in 1980. Far before Aspartame came into common use and I know she never drank any "diet" sodas at that time.
But, as you said, aspartame could be a further factor (as it is a chemical) in why people today are getting sicker.

We, as a culture, put very little completely natural foods in our bodies. We have become a chemical based society.

As for growing out of allergies, it can happen. I was highly allergic to strawberries when I was very young. But by the time I was 10 or so, I had outgrown it.
But, you can "grow" into new allergies. Our body chemistries change every few years. My body has been on a 7 year cycle. Under 7, I was allergic to strawberries.
At about age 7, I developed a "cold" that I happened to get every fall. My parents later found out that it was allergies, not that I didn't want to go to school.
At 14 I became allergic to most metals. I can't even wear silver. Only gold. And if I wear to much 10k gold, my skin will still break out. That means, no watch on my wrist.
At 21 I developed skin allergies to most man made fragrances. That means I can only use one kind of soap (it's $8 for 1 bottle), few shampoos and 1 kind of lotion. I also have to be careful of make-up, laundry detergent, fabric softener, dish soap, perfumes and anything else that may have some sort of fragrance added to it.
At 28, my regular allergies got worse.
Now, I have found out that my body no longer likes caffeine. That means no coffee, regular tea and most sodas.
I also have allergies to latex and to most glues used in bandages and tapes.

I'm starting to think that about 7 years from now, I'll develop Lupus and be allergic to myself.:sad2:
Luckily so far, I haven't developed any food allergies.

Oh, I and was born in 1972.


But, I do think that the vast majority of our problems today are because of all the chemicals that we put in our food to ingest. Not to mention all the chemicals put on our bodies.
Genetics just makes us more suceptible to having these problems.
 
Now, I have found out that my body no longer likes caffeine. That means no coffee, regular tea and most sodas.
....
Genetics just makes us more susceptible to having these problems.

I'm getting that caffeine sensitivity, too. It stinks to try and keep up with a toddler after a long night.

I think your second point also makes sense. Lotsa lotsa genetic crosses, and therefore a lot more recessives popping up in the population.

Brandie
 
Return to breastfeeding our kids. Diabetes, high cholesterol, food allergies, increase in breast cancer rates, etc, are proven to have links to whether the adults were fed formula or breastmilk as children. The increase in food allergies also follows the decrease in successful breastfeeding.

But hey, breastfeeding isn't going to make anybody rich, so why should we listen to the laboratories saying the same things my grandmother said for years??? *argh*

Brandie

My mother couldn't breast feed me, she had a bad pregnancy and didn't have enough milk. I grew up healthy with only a slight intolerance to mussels. My sister had triplets so mostly had to bottle feed and her children have absolutly no alergies what so ever, the are at the moment suffering from teenagitus but everyone suffers that one (and I mean everyone!!!!) Being serious I thought you where not supposed to feed peanuts or any nuts to children before the age of 5.
 

FTR, I never said allergies did not exist amongst my peers, but they did not exist in the vast numbers seen today. As a kid, the ones who had food allergies were the exception. Now it is commonplace.

I think part of the apparent "rise in allergies" is the spotlight on it. When hubby was growing up, he and his mother managed his allergies. Nowadays, the schools have a legal responsibility to manage the allergy, which makes it more visible to others.

For example, DH has an aunt who teaches Home Economics at the college level (no snickering, you! I heard that!) and she gave me a recipe book for a wedding present (9 years ago). When she asked me if I had cooked anything out of it yet (yet being while I was engaged), I thanked her for the gift and said unfortunately, it was a good Southern cookbook, full of milk products, so I hadn't been able to. She retorted, "Well, just make him a peanut butter and jelly sandwich then!" :scared1: :rotfl: MIL was listening at the sink and just turned around and stared at her for a long moment with her jaw dropped.

DH tried to participate in "normal" activities growing up, and expects kiddo to do the same. We still eat at Texas Roadhouse on a weekly basis. :rotfl:

I think we're also confusing the high initiation of breastfeeding rates in the 70's with a high rate of continuing nursing--that isn't actually possible. Going back to http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1448139
"Despite the advice of both the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) that infants should exclusively breastfeed for 6 months—that is, consume no other food, not even water, during this time—only 17% of American women adhere to the recommendation. Fifty-three percent of lactating mothers introduce formula before their babies are a week old, 68% do so by 2 months, and 81% by 4 months."

Brandie
 
I breastfed my son for a year. He has asthma and peanut allergies. He's also allergic to lots of other things. He was plagued with ear infections as an infant. I am a huge supporter of breast feeding, but it doesn't eliminate all health problems.

Your kid and my kid sound just alike.

I see this issue as akin to herd immunity. We innoculate so many at 80% protection in order to have a group resistance. Just because the resistance isn't 100% is no reason to knock it!

On another note, did you see the article in Feb 2006's issue of Pediatrics where they showed a dose-responsive effect from breastfeeding with regards to morbidity and mortality of 6 major diseases for newborns? As in newborns who were fed exclusively breastmilk had less incidents of ear infections than those who only had 4 months of exclusive nursing? Pretty neat to have the journal articles to prove this sort of tribal knowledge.

Nursing is a wonderful thing, and I think more support of the nursing dyad is needed to raise the US's numbers. It is a shame how many stories we hear of "my mom was unable to nurse me." So much of my difficult nursing experience could have been avoided! Oh well, hindsight is 20/20! *sigh*

Brandie
 
My 4yo (today he is 4 actually) is allergic to peanuts.

I noticed it when I gave him a brownie on his first birthday & I put peanut butter in them & he got some hives & threw up. So I told his allergist (he already had/has a dairy allergy).

I just took him for his yearly labs about 2 weeks ago & we then went to the allergist on Monday & his peanut numbers have come down to 11 (anything under 2 is normal)-his dairy is in the 60's now & it was over 100 at one point (again anything over 2 is not normal).

The allergist didn't want to do a test on him to see if he can tolerate it but maybe next year he can be free of a peanut allergy & that will be one less thing I have to worry about on him-he is also allergic to tree nuts & egg whites as well as peanuts & milk. But I can give him egg whites cooked in things & he has no reaction.
 
/
Does anyone ever wonder if it is because allergic/asthmatic people used to die younger? And not necessarily "just" from an exposure and reaction. But, all of us that suffer w/either condition know that we are more susceptible to viruses and bacterias....especially when we are around our triggers (nice, moist sinus membranes where germs thrive). I'm fairly certain that I would not have lived past childhood, based on my allergies and infections, had I lived in the "old days" (you know, back when great grandma was a girl, and there were no cars, and Jesus lived? - said by DD :rotfl: ). I'm not even sure there would be a "me", my mom's allergies might be worse than mine...

It's just something to think about...all those deaths from "consumption", etc....maybe know that we know more, and can do more medically...our infant and child mortality rates are better, so maybe that's a factor?
 
Does anyone ever wonder if it is because allergic/asthmatic people used to die younger? And not necessarily "just" from an exposure and reaction. But, all of us that suffer w/either condition know that we are more susceptible to viruses and bacterias....especially when we are around our triggers (nice, moist sinus membranes where germs thrive). I'm fairly certain that I would not have lived past childhood, based on my allergies and infections, had I lived in the "old days" (you know, back when great grandma was a girl, and there were no cars, and Jesus lived? - said by DD :rotfl: ). I'm not even sure there would be a "me", my mom's allergies might be worse than mine...

It's just something to think about...all those deaths from "consumption", etc....maybe know that we know more, and can do more medically...our infant and child mortality rates are better, so maybe that's a factor?

I have given it some thought. I wonder how many kids had anaphylactic and fatal responses to a food and died and it was attributed to something else.
 
I think quite a few, but not from "consumption" -- that's was tuberculosis, which is a really slow death.

My money is on choking or heart failure being given as the cause of death in most of those cases, and I think that most of them probably died before they reached age 5, so people didn't encounter them in school.
 

PixFuture Display Ad Tag












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top