I don't think either forcing an abortion or forcing a birth is the way to handle it.
In the scenario where the father wants an abortion and mother does not he should be able to sign away his parental rights. He gets no contact but also shares no financial burden.
In the opposite scenario there should be a way for the father (and his insurance) to incur the cost of the pregnancy and delivery and then the mother has the same option of signing away her parental rights, just like the father did. This of course would be a choice and not a mandate and in this scenario if the mother ultimately chose abortion than that is what it will be. It does open up another option in which basically you are opting for adoption by the father. I don't see anything wrong with offering more choices.
Nope. Usually, FireDancer, you're reasonable, but you're dead wrong on this one. Biology made this choice for us, and "more choices" just can't exist.
You men can't really whine. It's not like you lost out in the gene pool lotto. You got some pretty good stuff:
You don't have to sit on public restroom seats to pee.
You can reach stuff on the top shelf.
You don't have to deal with morning sickness, stretch marks, leaky breasts, fear of pain in labor, or c-section scars.
You can be middle aged, a little chunky and sporting a receeding hairline and still be considered good looking.
You still rule the work world.
You go on a diet and two days later are down five pounds.
Your clothes cost less and are easier to fit.
And the one that trumps them all: You don't spend 1/4 of your life from ages 12-55 dealing with menstration.
You got some good stuff from Mother Nature. Guess what . . .
this one's ours. We get to decide about the babies inside our own bodies!
Maybe you think it's not a fair trade-off, but it is what it is.
Plus, we already have enough people scamming the welfare system. Imagine how many fathers would "sign away their rights" so that the mom could qualify for more aid . . . and all the time he's living in the same house. Do we really need more ways for people to cheat the system?
Thank you. And for anyone kicking their child out with a baby, you are continuing the problem of prostitution and drugs and all sorts of illegal activity because they have to do what they need to , to survive.
Blatantly untrue. Every year I know a couple students who've been kicked out of their parents' houses for various reasons, and
every single one of them ends up couch-surfing at friends' houses -- not turning to prostitution, etc. Most of them reconcile with their parents after a cooling-off period, though once they've left their parents' home once it seems to be easier for them to do it again later. I don't know a single teen who's turned from a good kid to a criminal-in-training in such a situation.
In fact, the most common thing that causes a split this large between teens and parents seems to be drug use. So those kids were already breaking the law.
I guess you have never made a mistake.
There are mistakes, and then there are MISTAKES.
A mistake is forgetting to thaw the chicken, letting the tub overflow, missing your dentist appointment -- yeah, you were wrong to make that choice, but no long-term harm comes of it.
Having unprotected sex (at any age) when you're not prepared to raise a child is a MISTAKE. In fact, with all the diseases out there, pregnancy isn't the worst thing that can happen: unprotected sex really is like Russian Roulette. It's one of those things that a rational, mature person just doesn't do.
Schools can't require a pregnant teen to drop out, but they certainly can make it the more attractive option. For example, the school I attended had a strict "5 absences in a semester and you lose credit" policy. It wasn't targeted at pregnant teens but it certainly did make them think twice about continuing to attend, knowing that they'd lose credit at the very least for the semester in which they delivered and in all probability for the morning sickness semester as well. They can call you in to the counselor's office to talk up the perks of the alternative school, kick you out of any extracurriculars with a leadership element on the grounds of being a bad example, etc. And there are a million other little things that can make the school environment hostile to a pregnant teen. Sure, it might not be entirely above board but how many parents are going to hire a lawyer and fight the school board in the name of their pregnant kid? No student at the school I attended carried a pregnancy to term while attending. That wasn't coincidence.
Ah, no. This is in no way representative of what I've seen in the public school system for the last 20 years.
Pregnant students ARE held to the same attendance requirements as other students prior to delivery. Those who have extraordinary situations are often provided with individualized help; for example, a girl with really awful morning sickness might be dropped from her first period class but allowed to continue with her later-day classes. After delivery, they are have homebound services for 20 class days; they are required to do their schoolwork but are counted "present".
In general, if the girl is a senior, she usually has enough sense to know that she has to do the schoolwork. Seniors sometimes even have it together enough to ask for their work ahead of time, anticipating that they'll have a rough time adjusting after the birth. Younger students usually just ignore their schoolwork, and they usually don't end up getting credit for that semester -- but it's because they don't do the work, not because they're being forced out by an evil regime.
I am surprised that so many women are comfortable giving their grandchild up for adoption.
Comfortable? None of the options available to a pregnant teen are even remotely "comfortable". The question is what's best for the teen and the baby. Kind of like giving kids vaccinations when they're toddlers, kind of like punishing them when they've done wrong . . . what's best for them in the long run isn't always "comfortable".
We're not talking about one poor decision, we're talking about a cascade of them, if we go with the 'your 15-year-old is pregnant and wants to keep the baby'
- Having sex without proper protection.
- Not taking post-sex precautions.
- Not getting an abortion.
- Not finding nice adoptive parents.
I agree that if a 15-year old is having a baby, she's made a cascade of poor decisions, but I'd detail those bad decisions a little differently:
- Choosing to have sex at 15, when no one is ready for the potential fallout.
- Choosing not to use birth control.
- Choosing a boy who doesn't care enough about her/himself to insist upon birth control for their mutual protection.
- Most people do not get pregnant the very first time, so she's probably made these same bad decisions multiple times before she "gets caught".
ONE bad decision alone wouldn't lead to her being pregnant -- it takes multiple bad decisions to get her into this situation.
It is important to take these stats with a grain of salt because the sample is often manipulated. Specifically many of the studies and surveys they are drawn from define teen parent as a *minor* teen, thus limiting the sample to the most vulnerable and most disadvantaged. The teen mothers who have the best outcomes are those who are adult-teens when they give birth and they are excluded from many surveys of outcomes for teenage parents because they're defined as adults rather than teens.
I know quite a few women who had their first child in their teens and went on to do fairly well in life, myself included, but every single one was 18+ and out of high school before having that child. I've yet to meet someone who had a child at 15 or 16 and went on to succeed.
I've read those statistics (or similar) from multiple sources over the years -- I find it hard to believe that so many groups would be out to make teen moms look bad.
In all fairness, I think the statistics say that most teen moms live in poverty for at least a portion of their lives. Doesn't mean their entire lives, but it's pretty certain they'll have a taste of poverty.
Also, saying that they're on welfare during their child's first year doesn't mean they'll stay on it.
But these aren't happy statistics, and they do fit what I've seen in real life. I do agree with you, though, that the age of the mother is paramount in predicting whether she'll overcome this obstacle or not.
Also, how many were living in poverty and/or on welfare before getting pregnant? I have no idea, what before I drew any conclusion from those statistics, I'd need to know that. How many were planning on attending college before they got pregnant? The post implies that these things (poverty, lack of college, etc.) are because of the pregnancy, but they may not be (not saying that they aren't, just that the stats quoted don't prove that they are).
A fair question -- collation isn't cause and effect. I said earlier that I don't see our top students at school walking around with big bellies. Kids from higher socio-economic families tend NOT to get pregnant, whereas teen pregnancies are
more common in less educated, less wealthy families.