a 6yr old rode her bike down a driveway into the street,behind a van, right into my son's car as he was driving by ,back passenger side door is where she hit.
Wouldn't the fact that the girl hit the
door of the car indicate that she came out
after the driver would have had a chance to see her/react, depending, of course, on the speed the car was traveling at the time of the accident? I know from my own experience in a recent accident where I was hit (not my fault

) that they often deal with he said/she said, but in "reconstruction" of the accident based on physical evidence, they can usually tell who's at fault. My insurance co was so confident I was not at fault, they went to arbitration, because the (16yo) other driver's mother (who wasn't even there) lied despite the driver admitting fault at the scene, unfortunately no police report (though I know better now). I know it's involving a child, but why should he have to pay
anything if he wasn't at fault?
When my brother was little my father drove down the street just in time to see him ride his bike out of the driveway without looking. All these years later, my mother still tells the story of how my father got out of the car, broke the bike with his hands, and didn't let him ride again for a very long time.
My mother got her license late in life, when she was in her 40s. She was a nervous driver to begin with. When she first got her license, something similar to the OP happened to her, the child flew out of his driveway without looking (luckily we were going very slow down a crowded side street). The child went under the car (from the front, I believe) and I still remember my mother freaking out thinking he was dead. He was unhurt, but it
terrified my mother, to the point it was years before she would drive again (and I swear there are still ripple effects of that accident, including to myself and my children). That particular family did the same thing, hounded us and made us buy the child a new bike.
