Sarangel
<font color=red><font color=navy>Rumor has it ...<
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2000
- Messages
- 3,078
It's an article on SaveDisney.com about how Roy O. Disney viewed the company after Walt died. It says a lot of the same things we've said here over the last couple of years, like
This article reminded me of a book I recently read, titled "Good to Great," that discussed what made companies stand above others. One of the principles was a "Type 5" leader, one who was more focused on the company than himself, was willing to take the financial risk to promote their core values, one who inspired rather than browbeat, and worked to preserve the long term interests of the company. It sounds to me that Roy O. was one of these leaders.
Sarangel
One of the major problems with Michael Eisner is that he seems to have forgotten (or disregarded) this principle.While Roy continually looked for ways for the company to grow, he wisely avoided expanding into areas that would not be in the best interests of the company's core businesses ... Roy knew that focusing on core divisions - animation, film/television production, Imagineering, and the Parks - was key to the financial health of the company.
This article reminded me of a book I recently read, titled "Good to Great," that discussed what made companies stand above others. One of the principles was a "Type 5" leader, one who was more focused on the company than himself, was willing to take the financial risk to promote their core values, one who inspired rather than browbeat, and worked to preserve the long term interests of the company. It sounds to me that Roy O. was one of these leaders.
Sarangel