OceanAnnie
I guess I have a thing against
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 17,394
I don't like to use the analogy "life is unfair" in situations like this because that is usually when something is beyond your control, this punishment wasn't. The students were told that to avoid punishment they would have to tell on the bully. They told and the school changed the terms after the fact, and for what reason? It doesn't even make sense, if the purpose was to get the bully to admit it then why make the rest of the class tell in the first place, why threaten them with punishment if it didn't matter whether they told or not? They are 6th graders and sure there will be many times when things aren't fair however we should still be treating them with some respect and not make things unfair for them just because we can. They could have been up front, if bully kid doesn't tell you all will miss recess, fine if thats how it is going to be, but they changed it and thats whats not right. Of course I've always had a problem with authority![]()
As someome pointed out, the bully is probably loving this, he does something wrong and the whole class gets punished, I'm sure thats really going to make him think about his actions next time![]()
I agree with your post. I think you hit the mark dead on. I'm another one that isn't for the, "Life is unfair.", statement used to make something that is not right, seem right.
Why are they not punishing the kid that did it? Why does everyone else have to learn "this boy's" lesson? Couldn't they learn the same lesson by seeing the boy receive punishment that fit the crime? It all seems like a really poorly thought, backward way of addressing the problem. Strange.