September 1st. My son's b-day is Sept. 14 so when he started kinder he was the oldest in his grade. One of his classmates was born Aug. 31, she was the youngest. It was crazy, how he was almost an entire year older, but yet they were starting school at the same time.
I do remember hearing something said in passing by a district employee that kindergarten is legally optional in California. I looked it up, and school is only mandatory when a child turns 6.
Sept 1st.What is the latest date a child can turn 5 to be a kindergartener in your town?
Where I live its before the first day of school.
It's October 1st here, but a lot of boys are red shirted and start a year later, or repeat 8th grade at a private school, because of sports.I don't know if it's really a help or a hindrance. I come from a family where it's almost a sense of pride to show academic achievement at a young age.
I did read something about Canadian hockey players. Supposedly there was a correlation of the best players being the oldest in their youth hockey age groups.
Im not sure but this will give me a chance to say this, girls should be able to start school 1 year before boys, boys mature much slower and geting into each grade with a year more maturity would help the boys so much more
It's October 1st here, but a lot of boys are red shirted and start a year later, or repeat 8th grade at a private school, because of sports.
First to the OP: Cut off date is September 31 here. School starts in mid-August.
I'm going to go off on a tangent here. My son's birthday is in late September and we decided to start him late. There were a lot of reasons for it -- academic and social -- but NONE of them were sports related. It really bothers me that people say "they did it because of sports." And I knew it was coming as soon as I saw the subject of the post... someone ALWAYS says it.
It really trivializes the decision and makes it sound like parents are willing to sacrifice their kids' education for the possibility of some high-school "fame" on the sports field... rather than the real reason which was to make their education better. There may be some weirdos that look at their 4 year old and see the next star quarterback, but do you really think that's why "a lot of boys" are started late?
My son's in high school now and he does play sports. He's an average player for his grade level. He's not a star. Of the other families I know who also started their kids late (boys and girls) there's not a star athlete among the bunch... and I don't think anybody's parents expected them to be. And several don't play sports at all.