SandyinMonterey
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 3,565
I can't imagine where they would add on at VGF unless they were to convert one of the existing outer buildings to villas instead of actually building new. It wouldn't surprise me but I guess it would end up like CCV & BRV and not like AKV where both Jambo and Kidani are all part of one DVC resort.we were @ WDW a couple weeks ago. Family next to us just came off tour(think they already own, just adding on). Anyway, DVC Guy said next DVC resorts will be POR & adding more to GF.
Or across the street.I can't imagine where they would add on at VGF unless they were to convert one of the existing outer buildings to villas instead of actually building new. It wouldn't surprise me but I guess it would end up like CCV & BRV and not like AKV where both Jambo and Kidani are all part of one DVC resort.
There are several areas there they could put something but they might have to move parking. I don't know the quality of the underlying land but the debate at CR over whether they could add a second tower tells me that no one else does either. They could also move the golf course around.Isn't that the golf course and SOG?
Unless you mean on the other side of the GF, closer to the MK?
View attachment 317401
If it wasn't from a bus driver it means nothing.
The golf course is mostly in front of the Poly and wedding pavilion. It would be a very long walk from the main GF building to get to anything built there. I think, in fact, that it might be a shorter walk from the Poly's grand ceremonial house than it would be from GF's main building.
There's a parking lot across the street from the wedding pavilion and the current DVC building. The spa is located there. It's conceivable that they could build another DVC building where the spa is located, but the spa would then have to move somewhere (perhaps to the convention center building?).
The main GF parking lot is on the other side of the spa. It's conceivable that something could be built there, but they'd then have to move the main parking lot across Floridian avenue, making it a very long walk to get to the main building. I see this as an unrealistic alternative.
5) The new hotel at DisneyLand in California (700 room hotel)....some rooms may be DVC. (let's hope)
I haven’t heard anything about this. Latest rumors show the River Country site as potential DVC.
This one is the least likely, due to the Anaheim zoning plan for the Disneyland Resort Area. There is a hard cap of 150 total timeshare units in the area plan, and to add units requires a Conditional Use Permit. There is no possible secrecy around adding units because of the hearings required. without a big change in the area plan, which Anaheim has not shown willingness to consider to date, any addition of units will be a drop in the bucket compared to demand.
Also, based on the tax credit offered for the new hotel, if units were to become DVC, it would be more likely units at existing hotels and not this new one. Again, has to do with Anaheim's overall approach to Disney and the tax credit, with the zoning plan thrown in as a cherry on top.
Disney have a lot more flexibility in Florida due to overall regulatory picture and land ownership.
The 150 max includes existing at VGC.150 is better than none.
And if Disney reaaaaaaalllllllly wanted more and decided to enter the process, they'd get them in the end.
I believe it's based on how units are declared, based on how it's worded. But don't overcommit me to that.Do you know if that 150 limit is units? ie 75 2BR lock-offs, 75 1 BR and 75 studios or 150 2 BR lock-off units?