Colleen27
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 24,190
Curious if you have people around you threatening to switch to actual homeschooling if school stays online for Fall? There is a lot of talk about that here and I wonder if the threat of loss of funding has schools pushing harder to find a way to reopen?
I don’t have it in me to actually homeschool, but this online isn’t working, so I understand where these parents are coming from.
Yes. Mostly only among families who already have a parent who stays home or expects to be able to work from home long-term, but it is certainly a conversation I've heard and had with quite a few people. The issue here is that online learning isn't feasible in a school district that is focused on equity but serves areas in which high speed internet isn't available, so the public school response to this point has been optional, ungraded learning packets. Some teachers have supplemented that with optional Zoom calls, some haven't, but no online elements of distance learning can be required or graded because of the students who lack home internet so there's basically no instruction going on. There's a lot of concern about whether or not they'll realistically be able to do any better for fall. It isn't like the district is going to miraculously become less rural or the internet companies are going to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to run their service lines to widely spaced farmhouses, so the sense is that until we can return to school more or less as usual, there won't be much learning going on. And that's prompting the parents who are able to homeschool to consider doing so (and has also prompted some to contact our private school about enrollment for fall, since we are doing online classes and proceeding with the curriculum mostly as planned).
We're a zero-oversight state for homeschooling too, so parents who want to make the change don't have to jump through a lot of regulatory hoops to do so.
i have'nt heard anything around us (washington state) but i don't see where this would really work to the parent's advantage. the laws here are such that if a parent opted to do 'homeschooling' as it's defined in our state law then it's not like they stop paying for state education. they would still pay for it via all the same taxes just like those of us with no kids in school pay. sure, the school districts would lose out on that kid count for funding but i suspect that they would crunch the numbers and ultimately argue (when things settle down financially for the state) that the per kid cost of attendance has increased and will offset any losses that way.
It isn't that the families save by homeschooling - they'll still be paying the same property taxes. But the school tax portion goes to the state and then is sent back to districts on a per-pupil basis, so declines in enrollment mean less money for the schools. And the per-student costs don't scale well, so that loss hurts. It costs just as much to heat a building for 200 students as for 220, each building needs a principal and a secretary regardless of enrollment, and it costs just as much to have a teacher with 32 students in the classroom as to have her teaching 28. My area has an aging population and an outflow of young people who never return after college, so this is a perennial problem and there is absolutely no benefit to the school when there are fewer kids. It seldom works out neatly enough to reduce staffing, and certainly won't right now with the need to distance in the classroom. So the state may win if parents choose homeschooling (or not - there's a for-profit online charter that is marketing very heavily in my area right now) but the local schools are the big losers.