What are the rules of Pixar Place?

[skier_pete]

Rule #13: Turn Right to go Left!!!

 

[mcd2745]

Rule # 14: The Claw is our Master!

 

[MomofKatie]

Rule 15- You are a TOY!!!

 

[cranbiz]

Rule #16 Hakuna Matata

 

[DummbGiRL]

Rule #17: Kitty has to go now

 

[EpicBilynn]

Rule #18: Put that thing back where it came from or so help me!

 

[LockShockBarrel]

No weapons on the table

 

[ashnic4286]

Rule #20-revenge is not an idea we promote on my planet

 

[skier_pete]

My favorite part of this thread - that the OP has not returned to explain what-ever the heck it was he meant in the first place.

 

[msb578]

My favorite part of this thread - that the OP has not returned to explain what-ever the heck it was he meant in the first place.

Maybe OP didn't know that Disney wholly-owns Pixar? Maybe he/she was thinking there will be some rights/contract issues?

Other than that, yeah I don't know!

 

[floralmouse]

Rule #23: Never mess with a Marine's coffee if you want to live.

 

[Horace Horsecollar]

My favorite part of this thread - that the OP has not returned to explain what-ever the heck it was he meant in the first place.

I could be wrong, but I think I understand what the OP meant.

As a reminder, here's how this thread began:

What do we think the rules of Pixar Place going to be? With the various attractions be shut down in the other parks? Or just specific franchises?

What do we think?

I think there's a typo, and the OP really meant, "Will the various [existing Pixar] attractions be shut down in the other parks?"

It seems the OP is asking that if Disney expands Pixar Place at DHS, as has been rumored, then would Pixar Place become the focus location for all attractions based on Pixar movies, including ones that are now in other parks. In other words, what will Disney's "rules" be in determining what goes into Pixar Place?

I think the answer is that existing attractions will stay where they are. It doesn't make business sense to spend many, many millions of dollars to rebuild and move attractions and shows that are already in place. That money can be spent on something new -- or not at all.

 

[lockedoutlogic]

Did I miss something...or are we now in policy debate for the hypothetical?

 

[Zooshoveller]

I could be wrong, but I think I understand what the OP meant. As a reminder, here's how this thread began: I think there's a typo, and the OP really meant, "Will the various [existing Pixar] attractions be shut down in the other parks?" It seems the OP is asking that if Disney expands Pixar Place at DHS, as has been rumored, then would Pixar Place become the focus location for all attractions based on Pixar movies, including ones that are now in other parks. In other words, what will Disney's "rules" be in determining what goes into Pixar Place? I think the answer is that existing attractions will stay where they are. It doesn't make business sense to spend many, many millions of dollars to rebuild and move attractions and shows that are already in place. That money can be spent on something new -- or not at all.

I think the biggest typo was Rules. I think op meant Rides.

 

[Horace Horsecollar]

I think the biggest typo was Rules. I think op meant Rides.

Good point!

 

[Napria]

I think the biggest typo was Rules. I think op meant Rides.

While that is a good question, I like the direction this thread took.

Oh and rule #24 if momma ain't happy, ain't nobody happy. Not even Happy. (Or Doc, or Sneezy, or... Well, you get the drift)

 

[Dr Gevil]

Never use your powers - unless your Mom needs you to put a force field around the plane!

 

[abidale]

Everything the light touches is our kingdom.

 

[delilah]

Excuse me if somebody had this before, but Keep Moving Forward

 

[DummbGiRL]

Excuse me if somebody had this before, but Keep Moving Forward

#27 is a great rule... and perfectly introduces Rule #28: You've got to put your behind in your past