Crazy4Disney72
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2006
- Messages
- 1,057
First off, let me up front state my bias that I am already kind of offended, or maybe that's not the best word, maybe hurt is better, about my sister's wedding.
She is having a small wedding, which I get, she's not a flashy person, a small wedding of 60 people is more her style, and she is only having a maid of honor, no other bridesmaids. She has chosen our mother to be her matron of honor. I am her only sister, and she was my maid of honor, I always thought we had a good relationship, but I guess not as good as I thought since she does not want me involved in her wedding, but instead chose our mother who would already be a part of the wedding as the mother of the bride.
Anyway, that said, does this seem weird or is it how things are done? The wedding is at 1:00. The reception does not start until 4:30. On the information sheet that they sent out with the invitations there is a blurb that says
"Note that there will be free time for our guests between the completion of the ceremony at (name of church) (2pm) and the beginning of the reception at (name of reception venue) (4:30pm). Feel free to use this time as you like-whether to see some sights in St. Paul or to take a break in your hotel room."
Huh? out of the 60 guests at the wedding, probably 45 of them are from out of town. What are we supposed to do for 2.5hrs? I can't believe she is suggesting sight seeing while we are in our 'jacket required' wedding attire. I have never heard of this. Every wedding I have ever been to, immediately following the ceremony is the reception. The wedding party might not be there immediately because they are staying back at the church for pictures, but the guests have drinks and hor d'oeuvres and mingle while waiting for the wedding party to arrive, and then dinner is served. I don't recall there ever being such a huge gap of time between the end of the ceremony and when the bride and groom arrived, especially if the guests are not welcome at the reception venue until 2.5hrs after the ceremony! Is this really something that is done? Is it maybe common in the midwest? The only weddings I have ever been to were on the east coast.
I'm really interested to hear what other people think of this! Thanks!
She is having a small wedding, which I get, she's not a flashy person, a small wedding of 60 people is more her style, and she is only having a maid of honor, no other bridesmaids. She has chosen our mother to be her matron of honor. I am her only sister, and she was my maid of honor, I always thought we had a good relationship, but I guess not as good as I thought since she does not want me involved in her wedding, but instead chose our mother who would already be a part of the wedding as the mother of the bride.
Anyway, that said, does this seem weird or is it how things are done? The wedding is at 1:00. The reception does not start until 4:30. On the information sheet that they sent out with the invitations there is a blurb that says
"Note that there will be free time for our guests between the completion of the ceremony at (name of church) (2pm) and the beginning of the reception at (name of reception venue) (4:30pm). Feel free to use this time as you like-whether to see some sights in St. Paul or to take a break in your hotel room."
Huh? out of the 60 guests at the wedding, probably 45 of them are from out of town. What are we supposed to do for 2.5hrs? I can't believe she is suggesting sight seeing while we are in our 'jacket required' wedding attire. I have never heard of this. Every wedding I have ever been to, immediately following the ceremony is the reception. The wedding party might not be there immediately because they are staying back at the church for pictures, but the guests have drinks and hor d'oeuvres and mingle while waiting for the wedding party to arrive, and then dinner is served. I don't recall there ever being such a huge gap of time between the end of the ceremony and when the bride and groom arrived, especially if the guests are not welcome at the reception venue until 2.5hrs after the ceremony! Is this really something that is done? Is it maybe common in the midwest? The only weddings I have ever been to were on the east coast.
I'm really interested to hear what other people think of this! Thanks!


