BLTtinkerbell
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2009
- Messages
- 3,993
Happened to me this morning too. I sent an email to Member Services because I wanted to modify a reservation and couldn’t see my reservation. The website is so frustrating!
I can see dates to book a reservation.I can't get it to show me anything for date searches. 7:48 EST. Was wondering if it was just me before I start tearing apart my browser cache, network DNS settings, etc.

My akv-kidani points are telling me I can’t book jambo at 11 months. I chatted with dvc yesterday and they said they’re aware of the issue, and they can book for me. Doesn’t help if you’re trying to secure a tough room at 8am.
Did you post this on FB? If not, it’s apparently happening to others also.
My akv-kidani points are telling me I can’t book jambo at 11 months. I chatted with dvc yesterday and they said they’re aware of the issue, and they can book for me. Doesn’t help if you’re trying to secure a tough room at 8am.
Thankfully I'm not looking to book Jambo anytime soon but I would be pretty pissed if this happened to me.My akv-kidani points are telling me I can’t book jambo at 11 months. I chatted with dvc yesterday and they said they’re aware of the issue, and they can book for me. Doesn’t help if you’re trying to secure a tough room at 8am.
An ad blocker almost be definition messes with the way a website is supposed to work (as sites are not designed for ad removal) so you use them at your own risk.DVC owners should not have to be removing ad blockers and clearing our cache to reserve rooms.![]()
Ehhh, not really. I've used this one for 7 years, and this is the first issue I've ever had with any website. Once you get used to no ads, there's simply no going back to the normal web. The incessant ad loading nowadays is bonkers, to where you can't even keep track of what you're reading due to the html resizing everything constantly to make room for google adsense refreshing new banners or whatever.An ad blocker almost be definition messes with the way a website is supposed to work (as sites are not designed for ad removal) so you use them at your own risk.
Well, it assumes it redirects requests in a way unintended by the website operator (to kill the ads). Not sure why Disney should have to test for this scenario.Plus it's just a custom DNS, this isn't like a chrome extension ad blocker.
Well, it assumes it redirects requests in a way unintended by the website operator (to kill the ads). Not sure why Disney should have to test for this scenario.
I think Disney just updated their computer systems to run on Windows 95.Well like I said, they're literally the only site in 7 years to have an issue with the setup. So
It’s not redirecting requests in an unintended way, it’s just a DNS resolver that refuses to resolve known ad/spy domains. If the site falls over the moment one analytics hostname doesn’t resolve, that’s bad engineering.
But perhaps you aren't aware of how comically medieval Disney's IT teams are.