Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 29,639
I'm not quite sure which attractions you're thinking of but at least for Fast and Furious it's pretty much universally (no pun intended) panned. I have no idea why they didn't do a rollercoaster like I think they were rumored to do (I know they are doing that at USH). I thought it was corny but not in the cutesy way and I was so excited for it too and bummed when it got slightly delayed which meant we missed it on our 2017 trip. I mean it's a ride I can tolerate as far as going on it but coming from someone who enjoys the franchise (however far they've jumped the shark at this point) it was a letdown for sure. That attraction was like them saying they wanted the franchise but then thought of a way cheap way to do it.Okay and what they built is.....not great. Their latest 2 additions are cheap overlays that 1000% would've been hated across the board if they opened in a Disney owned park.
On the plus side I'm pretty sure the executives are aware of the reception and I doubt there will be much love lost if they choose to replace that pretty quick. Weird to think it's been around for more than 6 years at this point.
If you're talking about Bourne Stuntacular I think they did that one well although it can suffer from technical issues. But it was a good usage of space.