A night's sleep has helped me put this into perspective a little bit and I am no longer so upset. I continue to reflect on that experience and am still concerned about what occurred...
In my state, detention require "Reasonable Cause" From
Arizona Revised Statutes §13-1805 re: Shoplifting; detaining suspect...
"... C. A merchant, or a merchant's agent or employee, with reasonable cause, may detain on the premises in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable time any person who is suspected of shoplifting as prescribed in subsection A of this section for questioning or summoning a law enforcement officer...
Subsection A defines the act of shoplifting as
"A person commits shoplifting if, while in an establishment in which merchandise is displayed for sale, the person knowingly obtains such goods of another with the intent to deprive that person of such goods by:
1. Removing any of the goods from the immediate display or from any other place within the establishment without paying the purchase price; or
2. Charging the purchase price of the goods to a fictitious person or any person without that person's authority; or
3. Paying less than the purchase price of the goods by some trick or artifice such as altering, removing, substituting or otherwise disfiguring any label, price tag or marking; or
4. Transferring the goods from one container to another; or
5. Concealment."
I am quite sure
none of my activities in the that store yesterday could possibly be construed as conforming to those criteria.
Several posters here have mentioned that
Walmart in their areas, requires inspection/verification of EVERY receipt. Although that makes me CRINGE from a customer satisfaction perspective, I think that policy from a human rights perspective is better than what may
or may not be random checks without any explanation. Having slept on it, I am even more committed to spending a few hours there next Saturday to see who gets stopped and who doesn't. If I see and document what I reluctantly think that I might, I plan to ask some questions.
I am surprised by the number of people who have expressed the opinion that it's no big deal to be stopped, checked, and prevented from leaving this way. It's true that the Fourth Amendment only applies to the government and its agents... But GOLLY -- this behavior is still an erosion of what it means to live in a civil society. Why does Walmart do this and Nordstrom's does not? What if you wear a jacket to Walmart that you had previously purchased there, wouldn't the next logical step be requiring the receipt be stapled to the inside of the collar to prove that it had been paid for? And after that...who knows? Naked shopping? Body cavity searches? I am being silly here -- but honestly -- where is it reasonable to draw the line?
GOOD DISCUSSION, EVERYBODY!