Wow, is this ironic. A couple of years ago I was on the losing end of a thread and poll about the issue of saving tables. I attempted to argue that the practice of "saving seats" at CS restaurants wasn't fair to people with trays of food looking for a place to sit and that it was counter-productive as it lowered the number of times a table could be "turned" during a busy meal period and thus only made table shortages worse. I was told I was crazy, compared to the "mug police", people had never heard of such a notion, etc. etc. Someone started an opinion poll on the matter any my views were trounced 4 to 1 against. I eventually gave up and we started to save tables too... I decided why should my family be the ones to suffer since I'm so far in the minority and so few people seem to give a rip?
If they're actually doing this now (this is the first I've heard of it), I'm pretty sure they'll abandon it prior to our December trip. It seems like a good idea now, but as soon as they get the numbers back and realize they're spending 2-3x as much money on CM paychecks, with a mixed reception from the public, they'll drop it.
There is no question whatsoever that this will be a very bad thing for many families. It will hurt as many as it helps, if not more. It makes much more sense for me to take orders from my family prior to getting in line and for them to go find a table while I gather the food, perhaps with the assistance of my oldest child.
David
If they're actually doing this now (this is the first I've heard of it), I'm pretty sure they'll abandon it prior to our December trip. It seems like a good idea now, but as soon as they get the numbers back and realize they're spending 2-3x as much money on CM paychecks, with a mixed reception from the public, they'll drop it.
There is no question whatsoever that this will be a very bad thing for many families. It will hurt as many as it helps, if not more. It makes much more sense for me to take orders from my family prior to getting in line and for them to go find a table while I gather the food, perhaps with the assistance of my oldest child.
David
I'm glad to see this being done! I was one of the ones who got their head handed to them on the other thread when I defended waiting until you had your food to get a table. CS rest.'s are designed to have people not get their tables until they have their food. this is how they figure out the number of needed seats , when you save tables before your food then you totally screw up this equation and of course the rest. doesn't have enough seats. I hope they do this everywhere at Disney, when we were there at busy times people would be sitting for 10 minutes without food while others walked around with their trays,very rude.
I think it's probably a good idea but might be a hurdle for me and my kids. I have gone to the parks alone with my three young kids and no DH (or any other helper). I imagine this would make lunch a bit harder for me since I would be carrying everything lol, but well worth it to reduce the overall chaos factor.![]()
Did you read the comments from the 83% of people on the other thread about why they split up/saved tables? Many of those people -- myself included -- will resent being told they can't seat the majority of their family while one person orders the food. Kids are easier to manage at a table than standing in a line or in a waiting area.How do you know they will get a mixed reception from the public.
And they will also get unhappy reports from people who don't like it -- including me, if it's still in effect when we visit in December.the person that was there said it was easy to find a seat and if that is so they will get glowing reports. I know I will make a point of telling them how much I like it.
I'll be the judge of what makes more sense for my family, thank you.And your point of it making more sense isn't true.