kaytieeldr
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2005
- Messages
- 51,313
Flame? What flame? Alternating points - with, generally the existing TEST practice being defended against some, frankly, pretty negative posts - indicates a discussion, not flaming. Interesting interpretation, though.AdventurersClub said:Maybe it's just me but I don't understand why almost every post that says something against the new policy is being flamed for whatever reason.
It's an experimental actual procedure, currently being tested in a single location (not merely an experimental idea) at peak travel times. As both Geoff M and RustyScupper pointed out in separate threads, it absolutely does have the potential to increase revenue. Let me know if you'd like me to post the links to those posts again.AdventurersClub said:This is an experimental idea and probably won't work. As asianway said, why would Disney pay people to guard tables when there is no greater potential profit? The concept sounds good in a perfect world but I don't see this ever happening on a permanent basis.
I don't see why it won't last. 100% of the reporting DISers who experienced it have only positive reactions. In addition, again, it is being done at peak travel times. A Guest who goes to Pecos Bill's on a drizzly morning in January is likely not to encounter it - not because it didn't work, not because it's been terminated, but because that's not a time of year DISNEY feels it's necessary.AdventurersClub said:I do think this will be a nice concept I don't see it lasting for an extended period of time due to