It turns out we have one more day than originally planned for our LA/San Diego trip in August. This got me to wondering whether it would be possible to somehow fit a trip to Kings Canyon/Sequoia into our plan.
If we were starting somewhere in the northern LA area (maybe Burbank or North), is it really about 3.5 hours each way to the park? (That's what Google Maps says, but it's not always reliable.) I know that driving in the park itself will be slow, but if we know the time to/from, I could at least figure out whether it's worth the trip. Is it feasible to, e.g. leave around 8:00 a.m., get to the park around noon, spend 3-4 hours in the park, and then return by evening?
The main thing would be to see some of the giant sequoias (I've seen them; my family hasn't), the General Sherman tree, maybe one or two other particular sites, and maybe some other parts of the scenery that are quite different from what we can see elsewhere. I know we would be missing a lot of what a national park has to offer, but I think we'd be willing to give up a day to see these trees.
Also, my memory of the sequoias (and redwoods, which aren't near there) is from >20 years ago as part of a family trip where lots of different stops in California have blended together. I know that King's Canyon is not Yosemite, but am I remembering correctly that it's still a good park for natural scenery that you wouldn't get somewhere closer to LA?
If we were starting somewhere in the northern LA area (maybe Burbank or North), is it really about 3.5 hours each way to the park? (That's what Google Maps says, but it's not always reliable.) I know that driving in the park itself will be slow, but if we know the time to/from, I could at least figure out whether it's worth the trip. Is it feasible to, e.g. leave around 8:00 a.m., get to the park around noon, spend 3-4 hours in the park, and then return by evening?
The main thing would be to see some of the giant sequoias (I've seen them; my family hasn't), the General Sherman tree, maybe one or two other particular sites, and maybe some other parts of the scenery that are quite different from what we can see elsewhere. I know we would be missing a lot of what a national park has to offer, but I think we'd be willing to give up a day to see these trees.
Also, my memory of the sequoias (and redwoods, which aren't near there) is from >20 years ago as part of a family trip where lots of different stops in California have blended together. I know that King's Canyon is not Yosemite, but am I remembering correctly that it's still a good park for natural scenery that you wouldn't get somewhere closer to LA?