kellymonaghan
<a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis-sponsor/index.
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2000
- Messages
- 2,168
It actually was Kelly's book. I just picked it up today. It's definitely a good read and has the most diverse information on Universal. The sentence that stuck out most in mind was "Disney World as perceived by many as a kids park that adults will enjoy". I think that would be said by someone that has never been to Disney World. Any adult that has been knows that simply isn't true. Another one that got me is saying Disney tends to present itself as a park of yesterday, where Universal is a thing of tomorrow. That might be a knock. I happen to love the theming of the "yesterday" parts of Disney, primarily in the Magic Kingdom.
First, some background: Yes, I've been to Disney World. Many times. In fact, I've been known to cough up for an annual pass or two.


That out of the way, I am tempted to ask, "What part of 'Disney World is perceived by many as a kids' park that adults will enjoy' didn't Boomhauer understand? The fact that Boomhauer doesn't perceive it that way, doesn't make the statement any less true. Boomhauer is obviously not 'many people' and I stand by the statement.
And, if anything, it seems that Boomhauer actually agrees with the fact that WDW, especially MK, is bathed in nostalgia. Nothing wrong with that.
As to Universal being the "antithesis" of WDW, to the extent that is true, I think it only makes good marketing sense. Trying to out-Disney Disney would be a fool's errand. Trying to position yourself as a viable alternative to Disney, for those who might be looking for something different, on the other hand, makes perfect sense.
Boomhauer, if you prefer WDW to Universal, I respect you for your feelings. We live in a free country and everyone's entitled to their preferences in theme parks. I only ask that you extend the same courtesy and consideration to those who might (respectfully) disagree with you.