LuvOrlando
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 21,467
double post
I am amazed that I only heard about this incident hear and have not seen it on the news here in Philadelphia.
OH WAIT! Now I remember.
The Huntington Valley Swim Club told an inner city day camp that they wouldn't be allowed to swim at the club last week and returned their money. That was labeled as racist by all the news outlets and that's all we hear.
All the coverage on CNN is about the Philly incident but I have never seen one word about black racism in Akron.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/07/10/philly.pool.response/index.html
Good luck finding the Akron incident on CNN.
I am deeply irritated with our media coverage of black on white hate crimes. They have it covered for perceived white on black racial incidents.
Evidently, only whites can be racist in America.
(Am I allowed to speak this way in America without being labeled a racist?)
That's funny, I heard about both issues.
So, what do you think about the pool issue? Do you think race played a part in it or do you buy the story that they over booked?
I agree that the media has an issue with race. They do report more about race based crimes when the victim is black. Just as they report more about white missing children/women.
Evidently, only white children/women can be abducted in America.
(Am I allowed to speak this way in America without being labeled a racist?)
That's funny, I heard about both issues.
So, what do you think about the pool issue? Do you think race played a part in it or do you buy the story that they over booked?
I agree that the media has an issue with race. They do report more about race based crimes when the victim is black. Just as they report more about white missing children/women.
Evidently, only white children/women can be abducted in America.
(Am I allowed to speak this way in America without being labeled a racist?)
I have a question for those of you that are so adamantly in favor of the hate crime laws instead of just charging the person with the crime they committed (murder, assault, etc).
Do you think the scum that killed Matthew Shepard would have grown up to be outstanding, productive citizens if there weren't any gay people in this world?
Do you think the black kids that jumped the family in this story would be great, wonderful boys if only there weren't any white people in this world?
Do you think the Sunni's would stop all fighting if there weren't any ****e's?
What if we got rid of all the Jews? Would the Muslim countries be at peace?
My assumption is that there would still be plenty of violence in this world. I would guess these people would find another outlet for their backwards way of thinking and their anger and rage.
A crime is a crime. Adding the word "hate" to it doesn't change it to me.
Get rid of all the white people in this world and it is a safe bet that the group of boys referred to in this story would find themselves beating the crap out of other black people because they didn't like their shoes or hair style. Violent, psychotic people love to have an excuse like skin color or sexual preference but they are still violent once you take away the excuses.
You are correct about the white/black abductions and how they are covered by the media.
And no, pointing that out doesn't "label" you a "racist".
I think it is quite possible that the swim club did, indeed, overbook. I do not believe they intentionally banned them because they were primarily black. That is almost impossible to get away with in America.
Do you not believe the President of the Swim Club's explanation? Do you believe he is lying?
The bottom line question here is simple. What is wrong with the media in America?
Watching commercials in the USA and we can see that the white male is usually the dopey person with the black or female person in the same commercial as the one who promotes the cure for the dopey white guy's problem.
I began to notice this about 5 years ago after living in South Korea for a couple of years. There are no multi-racial or multi-cultural commercials there.
I found it interesting.
I would still have to support the perpetrators being charged with a hate crime rather than simple assault, if for no other reason than this someone charged with a hate crime potentially faces tougher sentencing guidelines than someone charged only with assault.
I would also be curious how many of you would be screaming so loud for these black kids to be charged with a hate crime if someone comes along with cell phone video showing the white family calling the black kids names before a single punch was thrown? Wouldn't that make the case interesting?
Which is exactly why I DON'T support a hate crime law. It brings on more problems than necessary; just as this thread has shown. People are outraged over the fact that this might not be labeled a hate crime. There are two sides to every story. None of us were there. We have no clue what the white family said. The police, judge and jury would have to make the best decision they can in this case. If it isn't a hate crime, it can spark outrage. Make the punishments the same. Murder is murder. The penalty should be incredibly steep whether you murdered your spouse, a best friend, a total stranger or someone of the opposite race. Obviously this wasn't a murder case but the assault charge should hold the same water whether racial slurs were spoken or not.
I would also be curious how many of you would be screaming so loud for these black kids to be charged with a hate crime if someone comes along with cell phone video showing the white family calling the black kids names before a single punch was thrown? Wouldn't that make the case interesting?
This reminds me of the Jenna 6 threads that were on the DIS a year or so ago. Those threads were very interesting.
I think the swim club reacted to the racist views of the members. If the club, (owners, managers...) had a problem with the campers, they would not have taken the money from the camp director.(A black woman)
Everything was fine until the parents (yes, I think they are racist) saw the campers and started to complain.
If the camp was over booked, the managers could have called several camps and asked them to share the slots. For example, instead of having one camp swim for 10 weeks, let each swim for 5 weeks and give each camp a 50% refund. Maybe allow those camps to be the first to book pool time for the 2010 season.
If the pool was over booked, why didnt they inform the camp director sooner? Im sure the swim times were booked late winter- early spring.
The contract has to state the dates, times and the number of swimmers. I don't believe the club would have allowed the camps to book peak swim times. How could the club not know they were over booked?
And what the heck did the President mean when he said the campers changed the complexion and atmosphere of the club?
I think the President is in COA mode right now.
And how do we know what the parents said? Because the camp director said this?
I don't know what the general membership of the Swim Club is. Do we know that there are no black members? Or are we just assuming?
That's what is wrong with the whole issue. Not enough facts are known. Just assumptions.
Let's not forget that so called Hate Crimes are Federal crimes and therefore have the Federal Government's resources available.
Some of the campers overheard the comments the parents were making.
You don't think it's odd that they just found out that the pool was over booked? Do you have any idea how far in advance camps book their summer programming? I'm sorry but the over crowded story doesn't fly with me.
I believe the club's decision was based on the reaction of the idiot parents in attendance that day.