hlyntunstl
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
- Messages
- 185
There's a difference between a camera in an office vs. in a room where people have personal items. Yes, I agree that a camera to illustrate the subpar or superior work is valuable but that should be done prior to a guest checking in. There's limited value IMO to taking pictures of a room for performance issues that guests have been using for any period of time. If I knew in advance that cameras would be involved (like possibly if I reported an issue), I would ensure that my personal items were put away. This is just my personal opinion and, as someone upthread noted, it's a no-win situation but I would speak to management and suggest that they inform guests in the future if cameras are going to be used in inspections even if it's just a note with check-in. If I can get a message thanking me for eating at Jiko the next day, I can't see that an automated phone message to guests that cameras may be used would be that big of a hardship.As far as cameras go, I'm not sure why anyone would be upset. What do you have in your room? I have a feeling that cameras are used to prove either subpar or superor mousekeeping. We do a form of this at work. When you are talking to someone about their performance, it's much easier (as a manager) to pull out examples of subpar work. Nowadays employers need proof and what better proof than a picture.