hlyntunstl
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
- Messages
- 185
There's a difference between a camera in an office vs. in a room where people have personal items. Yes, I agree that a camera to illustrate the subpar or superior work is valuable but that should be done prior to a guest checking in. There's limited value IMO to taking pictures of a room for performance issues that guests have been using for any period of time. If I knew in advance that cameras would be involved (like possibly if I reported an issue), I would ensure that my personal items were put away. This is just my personal opinion and, as someone upthread noted, it's a no-win situation but I would speak to management and suggest that they inform guests in the future if cameras are going to be used in inspections even if it's just a note with check-in. If I can get a message thanking me for eating at Jiko the next day, I can't see that an automated phone message to guests that cameras may be used would be that big of a hardship.As far as cameras go, I'm not sure why anyone would be upset. What do you have in your room? I have a feeling that cameras are used to prove either subpar or superor mousekeeping. We do a form of this at work. When you are talking to someone about their performance, it's much easier (as a manager) to pull out examples of subpar work. Nowadays employers need proof and what better proof than a picture.
Bill

I was just there last month. We noted the sign on the balcony railing and did keep our curtains closed and "unmentionables" off the balcony (not that we normally have them on display but just sayin)
Maybe I should've used my at the time 60 yo grandmother's logic and say "if they're looking that hard, they deserve to see something".